Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2012, 09:55 PM
 
Location: Toronto
3,295 posts, read 6,991,732 times
Reputation: 2424

Advertisements

Or is this just a pattern you'll never find in any US city (as far as I can think of, I can't imagine an example that really exists)?

Maybe in other countries this pattern exists (or so I've heard) but I don't think there is an American real-life example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2012, 10:02 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,640 posts, read 14,519,777 times
Reputation: 15357
I think there are several metros which are mixed.
In the Bay Area, there are many suburbs equally or more affluent than the cities, but also more which are becoming poorer. An example would be East Bay suburbs Pittsburg & Antioch, which are becoming low-cost destination from those moving out of Oakland & SF due to increased COL (and are seeing their crime rates rise as a result). However, other EB suburbs such as Danville, Orinda & Moraga continue to be exclusive & affluent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 10:05 PM
 
6,615 posts, read 16,506,670 times
Reputation: 4777
The only one I can think of is San Francisco. But as the other poster said, there are rich suburbs and poor suburbs in the bay area. The city, however, is overall considerably rich, unlike most other US cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2012, 11:09 PM
 
Location: surrounded by reality
538 posts, read 1,186,776 times
Reputation: 670
As far as I know, Portland, OR, comes the closest in the US to fitting this pattern. West Hills, which are very close to downtown, is the wealthiest area of the entire metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 01:45 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,861 posts, read 15,186,773 times
Reputation: 6757
Seattle. Besides parts of the eastside suburbs Seattle has the suburbs beat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
343 posts, read 930,089 times
Reputation: 198
I might actually say Dallas, since there are plenty of rich people within the city limits, and the suburbs on average are not all that rich.

Seattle is also a good choice, but there are certainly some rich Puget Sound communities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 07:28 AM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,063,788 times
Reputation: 1725
Los Angeles is getting that way..... look at how they have shipped tons of gangs and poverty out to the Inland Empire (San Bernardino, Fontana, Riverside, Ontario, Pomona, Moreno Valley, Colton etc. etc.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 08:01 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
14,361 posts, read 16,894,348 times
Reputation: 12390
DC is another city going in that direction. As the city gentrifies, the poor are being pushed into Prince Georges County, which in turn is pushing the black middle class who settled there a few decades prior further out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 08:03 AM
 
3,235 posts, read 8,683,787 times
Reputation: 2798
Would Monterey count? Salinas isn't that great of an area and is right next to Monterey but am not sure if Salinas would be considered a suburb of Monterey due to the small size of towns/cities of the area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2012, 09:30 AM
 
Location: New York NY
5,508 posts, read 8,702,730 times
Reputation: 12668
Its not the whole city, for sure but Manhattan in definitely in this pattern, where the affluent have been displacing the working and middle classes for decades, leaving only the poor, who live mostly in public housing. And that process continues in the few affordable parts of the Manhattan uptown (Washington Heights, Inwood, Harlem)

I think that over the course of time (decades) the poor will priced out of most of NYC as a whole and we'll end up like Paris, with a largely affluent city and the poor and working class banished to the inner ring 'burbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top