Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2008, 10:56 AM
 
238 posts, read 766,920 times
Reputation: 70

Advertisements

That would be nice. I sure hope so. It would shift the world's power, if nothing else, to places like Chicago and LA. A nice change of pace, if you will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2008, 10:57 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,894,516 times
Reputation: 7643
Will LA ever surpass NYC in population ?

Wouldn't count on it. If it ever happens, it won't be anytime soon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2008, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Scarsdale, NY
2,787 posts, read 11,497,836 times
Reputation: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade_word View Post
That would be nice. I sure hope so. It would shift the world's power, if nothing else, to places like Chicago and LA. A nice change of pace, if you will.
A larger population does not equal more power. Paris is smaller than LA, but Paris is a member of the Big Four (NYC, London, Tokyo, and Paris).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 01:33 PM
 
8,256 posts, read 17,338,961 times
Reputation: 6225
My parents bought this house in West L.A. for under 300k in 1994. About three years ago it was appraised at 1.2 million. It currently is worth around 1 million since I'm less than a 5 minute walk from the beach.

My aunt bought a condo a few blocks away in 1997 for less than 150k and it's worth I believe between 400k and 500k.

My friend's parents bought a house in El Segundo, CA in the South Bay for less than 500k in 1996 and it's worth 1.5 million now.

thePR did site a valid source ranking NYC number one in impact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Omaha, NE
1,119 posts, read 4,198,418 times
Reputation: 414
Default ..

I honestly believe that as a major power that San Francisco and San Diego has more potential..

LA is a world-class city hands down, there is no doubting that..

But when it comes to the push and pull factor it seems that San Francisco has a bit of a bigger impact on the US economically speaking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 06:57 PM
 
149 posts, read 200,911 times
Reputation: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessemh431 View Post
My parents bought this house in West L.A. for under 300k in 1994. About three years ago it was appraised at 1.2 million. It currently is worth around 1 million since I'm less than a 5 minute walk from the beach.

My aunt bought a condo a few blocks away in 1997 for less than 150k and it's worth I believe between 400k and 500k.

My friend's parents bought a house in El Segundo, CA in the South Bay for less than 500k in 1996 and it's worth 1.5 million now.

thePR did site a valid source ranking NYC number one in impact.
That list is rubbish. New York is not nearly in as much as a real estate downfall as LA and Chicago. Los Angeles is in a far more real-estate "crisis" than NYC and most of the cities hit hard are in the Los Angeles metro (after Detroit) and California.

DETROIT, STOCKTON, LAS VEGAS POST HIGHEST 2007 METRO FORECLOSURE RATES

People there in NY can obviously afford their homes in comparison to LA even though NYC is more expensive. New York had the only "immune" area in the country too: Manhattan.

Chicago is worse than Los Angeles. Chicago ranks 30, Los Angeles ranks 35 and New York City ranks 76.

Last edited by soho111; 07-27-2008 at 07:08 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,286,755 times
Reputation: 1333
Except the link you provided talks about metro areas and not the city itself. Some of the metro areas aren't even correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 08:04 PM
 
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
2,498 posts, read 11,436,020 times
Reputation: 1619
Quote:
Originally Posted by soho111 View Post
People there in NY can obviously afford their homes in comparison to LA even though NYC is more expensive. New York had the only "immune" area in the country too: Manhattan.
Not necessarily. 30.2% of New York City residents are homeowners. 38.6% of Los Angeles residents are homeowners. Both cities are too expensive for the wages of the average resident to own a home in this market. In both cities, many homeowners likely bought much earlier than the last eight years.

The source only considers metropolitan areas, but in the 2007 real estate market, only 3% of LA Metro area residents could afford to own the median home price and only 6% of NYC Metro residents could afford to own the median priced home. This is a statistic neither city should be proud of. These are extremely low numbers!!! 97% of LA area residents could not afford to buy the median home in 2007 and 94% of NYC area residents couldn't. I think it is safe to say that both cities are very unaffordable.

Source:
New York (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
Los Angeles (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
The most affordable U.S. housing markets - Jun. 28, 2007
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 08:08 PM
 
Location: Townsville AUSTRALIA
2 posts, read 4,993 times
Reputation: 12
Default Hello from FNQ...Far North Queensland

Greetings from Australia.
Would appreciate some help in how to introduce a NEW topic on memory loss after an accident.
In advance, thank you very much.
Cheers from Australia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-27-2008, 08:38 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,300,659 times
Reputation: 6917
Quote:
Originally Posted by missionhome View Post
Not necessarily. 30.2% of New York City residents are homeowners. 38.6% of Los Angeles residents are homeowners. Both cities are too expensive for the wages of the average resident to own a home in this market. In both cities, many homeowners likely bought much earlier than the last eight years.

The source only considers metropolitan areas, but in the 2007 real estate market, only 3% of LA Metro area residents could afford to own the median home price and only 6% of NYC Metro residents could afford to own the median priced home. This is a statistic neither city should be proud of. These are extremely low numbers!!! 97% of LA area residents could not afford to buy the median home in 2007 and 94% of NYC area residents couldn't. I think it is safe to say that both cities are very unaffordable.

Source:
New York (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
Los Angeles (city) QuickFacts from the US Census Bureau
The most affordable U.S. housing markets - Jun. 28, 2007
Bingo. Big problem in both areas!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top