Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-28-2013, 09:57 PM
 
1,295 posts, read 1,908,424 times
Reputation: 693

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Since you listed mostly cities below the Mason Dixon Line, let me guess which side your name refers to....
Hint: Anyone who mentions the Mason-Dixon line when referring to where they're from is on the side that still can't let go of the fact they lost the war almost 150 years ago.

A northerner would look like a liberal elitist, while a southerner looks like a redneck with an inferiority complex. Not really sure why anyone would say it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-28-2013, 11:11 PM
 
Location: Keizer, OR
1,370 posts, read 3,053,865 times
Reputation: 1184
Cumberland, MD
Erie, PA
Traverse City, MI
Duluth, MN
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2013, 11:40 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,165,301 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by natininja View Post
Hint: Anyone who mentions the Mason-Dixon line when referring to where they're from is on the side that still can't let go of the fact they lost the war almost 150 years ago.

A northerner would look like a liberal elitist, while a southerner looks like a redneck with an inferiority complex. Not really sure why anyone would say it.
Here's my hint: I am from the northwest originally, grew up in California and have parents from Chicago. We were nowhere near that war. Heck, my family was still in Eastern Europe. Oh, I am also economically and socially liberal.
Good try.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,308,869 times
Reputation: 13293
Nobody ever mentions Baton Rouge outside of LSU football. 805k metro
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-01-2013, 07:57 AM
 
12,766 posts, read 18,376,224 times
Reputation: 8773
Charlotte, NC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA
7,639 posts, read 18,125,272 times
Reputation: 6913
Quote:
Originally Posted by portlanderinOC View Post
Cumberland, MD
Erie, PA
Traverse City, MI
Duluth, MN
Are you sure all of those cities fit the "mid-sized" description? Traverse City has a population of only 14,894.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 04:35 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,948,981 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawg8181 View Post
Charlotte, NC
Uh, try again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschaton View Post
My vote would go to the gigantic "incorporated suburbs" of the Sun Belt. The largest of these are Mesa, Arizona (about 447,000 people) and Arlington Texas (about 374,000 people), but there are many similar cities in the 200,000 range in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and Texas.

They are never thought of because they have no real character - they only began being built up in the post-WW2 era, and the original municipalities were either tiny or didn't exist at all. But they are big. Mesa is the 38th largest city in the country!
I think the only one in Colorado over 200K is Aurora, and I'm sure you've heard of that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 04:47 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
Are you sure all of those cities fit the "mid-sized" description? Traverse City has a population of only 14,894.
Agreed. Cumberland has a grand 20,400 people.

Also, Charleston, WV, 50,000. For the most part, these are not grand cities being mentioned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Keizer, OR
1,370 posts, read 3,053,865 times
Reputation: 1184
Quote:
Originally Posted by tvdxer View Post
Are you sure all of those cities fit the "mid-sized" description? Traverse City has a population of only 14,894.
Sorry, I guess the local recognition made me assume it was larger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top