Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2013, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Upper East Side of Texas
12,498 posts, read 26,994,162 times
Reputation: 4890

Advertisements

Seattle

Portland

San Francisco

San Diego

Atlanta

DC

Pittsburgh

Austin

Miami
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2013, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Surprise, AZ
8,624 posts, read 10,148,927 times
Reputation: 7986
I would have to say Honolulu, Seattle, San Francisco, San Diego, and Salt Lake City. On a much smaller scale, I would say Sedona.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 09:46 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 3 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,462 posts, read 44,090,617 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531 View Post
San Francisco since most of the mountains and scenery are actually IN the metro area. Seattle, many of the mountains shown are just outside of it.
This. And I have to say that Pittsburgh has some lovely approaches.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 09:54 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,749 posts, read 23,822,981 times
Reputation: 14665
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro Matt View Post
Seattle

Portland

San Francisco

San Diego

Atlanta

DC

Pittsburgh

Austin

Miami
That's a good well rounded list. DC is underappreciated for it's beauty. There is an exceptional amount of green space there and it feels like a big city in a park. Pittsburgh also has one of the most unique topographical settings in the country with the hills and river confluence right at downtown. San Diego is also very pretty, nicest landscaping and waterscapes I've seen in a SoCal city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 10:00 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,749 posts, read 23,822,981 times
Reputation: 14665
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZLiam View Post
On a much smaller scale, I would say Sedona.
Agreed, Sedona along with Oak Creek Canyon, I actually appreciate the beauty there more than the Grand Canyon. Tucson also has a beautiful setting and I like the desert vegetation there and the surrounding mountains are stunning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
1,704 posts, read 3,443,841 times
Reputation: 2393
DC for sure.

Walk around Capitol Hill in spring and try to tell me otherwise. When I was there this January, it snowed overnight and I really don't think I've ever seen a more beautiful human settlement in my life than Washington under fresh snow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 02:59 PM
 
143 posts, read 332,499 times
Reputation: 178
I second the "definitely not LA" comment. Personally, I find SF, DC, and Boston to be the most aesthetically pleasing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 04:10 PM
 
Location: NYC/LA
484 posts, read 871,817 times
Reputation: 477
Definitely LA.

All the things the OP listed (mountains, ocean, hills, etc.), LA has all of that just within city limits...and all nicely interwoven with the man-made environment. Don't forget all the wildlife (mountain lions, bears, peacocks, etc.) that roam around here and in its natural habitats. One of the best whale watching places in the U.S. is Southern California. Did you know LA County has the most and diverse bird species in North America? Expanding out to the entire metro area, you get more of that plus islands, deserts, forests, waterfalls, rivers, lakes, wetlands, etc. The geographical, topographical, ecological, and climatic diversity of LA metro is incredible. The blend of LA's landscape and cityscape is really something to behold.

I would also say SF, Seattle, SD and much of the major Western U.S. metros are very beautiful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 06:05 PM
 
Location: Battle Creek, MI
494 posts, read 804,761 times
Reputation: 264
With this i would have to say Seattle as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2013, 06:11 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,515,553 times
Reputation: 5884
San Francisco while Seattle has some more majestic peaks close, SF has more stuff right around the city proper ... redwoods, marin headlands, napa valley, sonoma, cliffs up the coast towards bodega, larger beach areas, etc.


SF Citizen


hdnux


gary yost

[img]
QT Luong

Last edited by grapico; 08-11-2013 at 06:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top