U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2013, 10:48 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
9,423 posts, read 18,320,690 times
Reputation: 11902

Advertisements

What is the most remote, isolated and sparsely population part of your state? Describe the topographical features, climate, and any type of civilization/settlements that may exist there that keep it remote or lightly populated in terms of your selected state? This can be ay state, even Connecticut, or Wyoming including all ranges and scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2013, 11:14 AM
 
Location: East Coast of the United States
17,234 posts, read 19,531,226 times
Reputation: 12984
Garrett County - in the western panhandle of Maryland nestled in the Appalachian mountains.

It's a scenic area and has Deep Creek Lake, Maryland's tallest waterfall and activities like skiing, golf and rafting. Not far from Pittsburgh PA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 12:03 PM
 
9,967 posts, read 14,610,447 times
Reputation: 9193
Southeastern Oregon. Once you get south of Ontario or Burns or east of Lakeview there's more pronghorn antelopes than people by a considerable ratio. You can drive two hours and not see even a town, maybe a small settlement here or there. It feels more like northern Nevada than even most of the rest of Eastern Oregon. Really is sort of America's outback.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Brew City
4,217 posts, read 2,503,558 times
Reputation: 5649
Um....all of it?

I guess I'd go with the extreme NW corner of Montana. Even though the eastern part of the state is less populated I'd rule the SE corner out because I-80 comes through there. NW Montana would have won by a landslide even a decade ago but now with the Bakken oil field there is a lot more traffic. SW Montana is at the end of the Bitterroot valley which is the most trendy area of the state. Out of staters have been moving in to the region so it's one long narrow valley with a bunch of vacation homes now.

NW Montana is very rugged. It's out of the way to go anywhere so unless you have business up there, you're not going to stumble across it. Either there or the east central interior part of the state. Nothing but a few ranchers and a lot of antelope.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2013, 11:03 PM
 
2,769 posts, read 2,493,488 times
Reputation: 1920
In Washington State, parts of the Olympic National Park. It is west of Seattle on the peninsula and there are many areas that are impossible to get to unless you take a long hike. There is also a few tiny towns in the cascade mountains that you can only get to by ferry on Lake Chelan or a long hike in the mountains(Stehekin and Holden).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2013, 12:59 AM
 
2,096 posts, read 3,848,843 times
Reputation: 1214
For Oregon, I would say the southwest, southeast and northeast corners are pretty damn remote. The southeastern 1/4 of Oregon is pretty much the frontier, and the area between the southernmost Oregon Coast and the Rogue Valley is also very wild; people have died getting stranded there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2013, 03:53 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
3,075 posts, read 5,447,836 times
Reputation: 4309
For Michigan:

Isle Royale National Park in Lake Superior. It's technically within Michigan's borders, but it is closer to NE Minnesota and Ontario, Canada. Record high temp on the island is only 89 degrees. Average high for July is only 68! Moose and wolves pretty much run the place.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2013, 04:36 AM
 
56,551 posts, read 80,847,919 times
Reputation: 12490
I'd say the Adirondack portion of the North Country region of NY.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2013, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Austell, Georgia
2,145 posts, read 3,032,001 times
Reputation: 2011

The North Georgia Mountains Part 1 - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2013, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,663 posts, read 74,231,932 times
Reputation: 36087
For Texas, it would be the Rio Grande Valley between Big Bend and Langtry. You can be 30-40 miles from the nearest drivable track down there, and there is nothing on the Mexican side, either. Big Bend itself would be one of the most isolated places in the USA, if they had not designated it a national park.

https://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&l...20163&t=m&z=10
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top