U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2013, 10:47 PM
 
25 posts, read 63,702 times
Reputation: 16

Advertisements

Culturally, geographically, human geography and geologically / C.O.L. / Etc.

What are some of the major comparisons?
What really sticks out when comparing and contrasting the two?

Besides the FR being *slightly* more 'isolated' geographically...?

Thanks.
This is my 1st post!!! Yay for me!!! )
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2013, 10:58 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
9,430 posts, read 18,331,107 times
Reputation: 11902
-Seattle is a much more dense than Denver and is a lot more green and forested and has more steep hills with waterfront all around the city. Denver is very much landlocked.
-Denver has a whole lot more sunshine and is a bit more affordable than Seattle.
-Denver is a better sports city.
-The Front Range has better skiing.
-Tacoma is like a blue collar more industrial version of Seattle, Colorado Springs has a much different and more conservative demographic than Denver.
-UW is right in the city of Seattle, CU has its own college town base of Boulder with a lot of notoriety as a liberal college town.
-Puget Sound area has a larger corporate base with an edge city of Bellevue which has its own impressive skyline, along with Redmond and the Seattle metro is home to more fortune 500 based companies.
-Seattle is more of a foodie town and an international gateway on the Pacific Rim, where Denver feels very much like an All American city.
-They are both good places for potheads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2013, 06:49 AM
 
25 posts, read 63,702 times
Reputation: 16
Would you say that the Puget region has a higher cost of living (col)?

Also, wondering what the population difference is like. Aren't there more outlying cities ringing the Sound? With more people?

Or, does Loveland, Boulder, Etc make up for that?

Overall, the F.R. is probably more typically 'conservative' right?

Thx.



Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top