Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are NY and PA Great Lakes states?
Yes 17 37.78%
No 28 62.22%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2014, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Cleveland
3,415 posts, read 5,126,326 times
Reputation: 3088

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Yet their metros combined account for barely 10% of the state's population.
That's just because NY is so weighted by the behemoth that is NYC. In most other states they would be major cities
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2014, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Somewhere extremely awesome
3,130 posts, read 3,074,467 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
Do they touch Great Lakes? Yes.
Is "Great Lakes States" the first descriptor I'd use for either? No.

I think of both as NE megalopolis states first. NYS is probably a megalopolis state first, a Great Lakes state second, and an Appalachia state third. PA is probably a megalopolis state first, an Appalachia state second, and oh yeah, a small piece touches a Great Lake.

Erie, Buffalo, and Rochester indeed have commonalities with other Great Lakes cities, but these places represent relatively small shares of the overall NYS and PA populations.
The only state that's overwhelmingly dominated by the Great Lakes is Michigan though. In the Midwest:

Illinois - yes, Chicago overwhelmingly dominates the state, and is on Lake Michigan, but 90% of the state isn't Great Lakes influenced. The Mississippi River is a much bigger water influence.

Indiana - only the extreme northwest corner; barely even worth mentioning.

Minnesota - pfft, Duluth and a few trees are on Lake Superior. This is arguably a less of a Great Lakes influence than in New York. The state is dominated by the Twin Cities, which are not Great Lakes cities.

Ohio - there's a bit more there, but if we go away from Cleveland and Toledo, a majority of the state is away from that. Probably the Ohio River is of roughly equal importance.

Wisconsin - possibly, with Milwaukee being on Lake Michigan and fairly long shorelines with populated areas. But even there, a fairly significant proportion of the state is oriented towards the Mississippi River.

Pennsylvania falls into the "barely Great Lakes" category, probably analogous (or even slightly less) than Indiana. New York has a bit more substance, definitely exceeding Minnesota. By land area infrastructure, I would say New York exceeds Illinois and is probably on par with Ohio, even though New York City is huge and dominant.

So yes, New York and Pennsylvania are Great Lakes states, and have an important place at the table when discussing issues related to them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top