Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-19-2014, 03:15 PM
 
Location: N. Glendale, AZ
23 posts, read 56,228 times
Reputation: 31

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by NowInWI View Post
The California Drought Is Far From Over, And The Entire State Is Suffering

I believe this problem, will be a problem for more than just California. If areas with drought conditions continue to grow, there WILL be problems...most definitely.
First, so many people replied to this :0

Second, as long as the water problems are dealt with/fixed the state will be fine. In fact, Downtown L.A. (who recorded its driest year ever in 2013) has seen many other periods where the annual rainfall was as low as 5 or 6 inches, even 4 inches. If the El Nino does form it will just be part of the pattern of super wet years then super dry years. Only reason so many are realizing water problems now is because California external water sources such as Lake Mead are suffering from actual drought. If you go to Noaa (Link Below), go to montly summarized data, replace 2000 with 1950 and hit go (any location doesn't matter), you'll find that the current drought is the driest but not such a rare occurrence, and that not all locations recorded their its driest year in 2013. I honestly think that everyone is worrying because Southern California can't dare produce enough water for its current and future population on its own and its external sources are starting to dry up.
National Weather Service - NWS Los Angeles/Oxnard
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2014, 10:56 PM
 
4,692 posts, read 9,306,402 times
Reputation: 1330
My top 15 are in descending order:
1. NYC no surprise here
2. LA also no surprise here
3. Houston
4. Chicago
5. Phoenix
6. Dallas
7. Philadelphia
8. San Diego
9. San Antonio
10. Austin cracks the top 10
11. San Jose
12. Charlotte
13. Fort Worth
14. Denver
15. Seattle

I know some may find it weird that San Francisco did not make it. I based my calculations off of estimates from 2010-2012 and assuming that these rates continue (which they probably won't but we have to go by something right?) the mentioned cities have the population growth rate and the land to outgrow San Francisco. Of course these are only city limits which have a minute point in the grand scheme of things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top