Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should Washington, D.C. have high-rises and skyscrapers?
Yes 26 29.89%
No 61 70.11%
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-23-2014, 11:36 PM
 
Location: Dublin, CA
19 posts, read 27,317 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

Definitely not. If Washington D.C. had high-rises and skyscrapers, it wouldn't be unique anymore. It would just be another plain old city like Los Angeles. In fact, there are building height restrictions in Washington D.C. to keep the historic uniqueness of the district. Perhaps that is why you can see the Washington Monument almost anywhere when within five miles of the capital.

I have visited Washington D.C. before, and honestly, I have to say it has the worst skyline ever. All buildings are practically the same height and contain the same architecture. Even Pentagon City and Alexandria look more interesting from the Potomac River on the D.C. side.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2014, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Charlotte (Hometown: Columbia SC)
1,462 posts, read 2,959,088 times
Reputation: 1194
Nope. The skyline sucks but when you are on the ground it feels urban and dense as hell. Where height doesn't even matter anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2014, 11:08 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
5,864 posts, read 15,244,428 times
Reputation: 6767
I think they should. With the building boom taking place right now DC is being overrun with bland, lowrise, stuck together boxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2014, 10:24 AM
 
32,025 posts, read 36,788,671 times
Reputation: 13306
Heavens, no. DC is superb as it is.

Tall buildings do not a city make.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-31-2014, 10:24 PM
 
243 posts, read 283,010 times
Reputation: 279
no...I like height restrictions in certain cities. Removing the restrictions in places like DC or Charleston, SC would cause them to lose some of what makes the city what it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2014, 06:09 AM
 
27,215 posts, read 43,923,184 times
Reputation: 32292
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
Heavens, no. DC is superb as it is.

Tall buildings do not a city make.
Exactly and tall buildings would take away from the unique (to this country anyway) architectural styles, not to mention the city's extensive tree canopy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-01-2014, 08:20 AM
Status: "Pickleball-Free American" (set 4 days ago)
 
Location: St Simons Island, GA
23,463 posts, read 44,090,617 times
Reputation: 16856
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamecock303 View Post
no...I like height restrictions in certain cities. Removing the restrictions in places like DC or Charleston, SC would cause them to lose some of what makes the city what it is.
So true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-02-2014, 12:25 AM
 
1,415 posts, read 1,094,590 times
Reputation: 853
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidd_funkadelic View Post
No, but it it they got rid of the high restrictions they should set it up like la defense in Paris.
But it barely manages even that. Sure it has the aesthetics of a European city, but it feels soo artificial in its nightlife or city life. One block that seems alive at night in the heart of DC? That doesn't seem right.

Everything below 395/695 to the river should be replaced with dense high-rises and mixed use skyscrapers which hopefully spills over across the Anacostia to redevelop Bolling AFB into more mixed use type high density buildings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 08:46 PM
 
354 posts, read 627,683 times
Reputation: 130
A Skyline doesnt always define a city
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-04-2014, 09:34 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,000,665 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by dontstressem22 View Post
A Skyline doesnt always define a city
Who would move to a city just because of the skyline? Could you imagine someone saying "This city has everything I'm looking for but it has such a bad skyline that I ultimately decided not to move there". lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top