Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city/area has better race relations? Minneapolis/St Paul or Seattle/Tacoma?
Minneapolis/St Paul 15 48.39%
Seattle/Tacoma 16 51.61%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-24-2015, 06:59 PM
 
1,185 posts, read 2,219,288 times
Reputation: 1009

Advertisements

Seattle because its more liberal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2015, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Michigan
4,647 posts, read 8,595,025 times
Reputation: 3776
Quote:
Originally Posted by beenhereandthere View Post
I disagree, while it's like asking who's the slimmest sumo wrestler at times, there are some places in the US that, more or less since they don't have a history as deep, are better off than others.
Racism is either present or not present. There's no way to determine if an area is more or less racist because your experiences are going to be majorly impacted by those who are racist, no matter how often or rare it occurs.

Plus, with media today and how information travels, it doesn't really make that much of a difference what the racial history of an area is. It's completely possible that any place that hasn't had a history of racial strife and is racially homogeneous could suddenly have it tomorrow because an in-migration other races disrupts that homogeneity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2015, 10:41 PM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,524,412 times
Reputation: 2038
Quote:
Originally Posted by animatedmartian View Post
Racism is either present or not present. There's no way to determine if an area is more or less racist because your experiences are going to be majorly impacted by those who are racist, no matter how often or rare it occurs.

Plus, with media today and how information travels, it doesn't really make that much of a difference what the racial history of an area is. It's completely possible that any place that hasn't had a history of racial strife and is racially homogeneous could suddenly have it tomorrow because an in-migration other races disrupts that homogeneity.
Maybe if one's paying attention, they wouldn't based how biased an area is on just their own experiences. I doubt if any black person would say (hypothetical situation) Anchorage is more racist than Birmingham, since one was called the N word one time in Anchorage and never in Birmingham. Look at the past history of Birmingham vs the past history of Anchorage about that kind of stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2015, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Moose Jaw, in between the Moose's butt and nose.
5,152 posts, read 8,524,412 times
Reputation: 2038
Slightly off topic, but verifies the point about history having something to do with race relations. Notice the emphasis on the Southern States.

KKK Was Terrorizing America Decades Before Islamic State Appeared
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-27-2015, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
1,912 posts, read 2,087,543 times
Reputation: 4048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amercity View Post
Seattle because its more liberal
Hah, what? Seattle and the Twin Cities are pretty similarly liberal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 04:21 PM
 
145 posts, read 160,278 times
Reputation: 122
The thing with Minneapolis is it really depends on where you are.

There are times when I'm driving around Calhoun or SLP and truly
forget that I'm in an extremely white midwestern city. The people
that you come across are extremely progressive, almost a mini Boston
if you will. Acting ignorant is really frowned upon in these parts.

It isn't until I venture about 10 miles away from the city-which I don't do often,
that I'm reminded that I do live in an area that is still "figuring things out."

I can't comment on Seattle, but I doubt few metro areas are as different from
city to suburb as Minneapolis is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 05:01 PM
 
Location: District of Columbia
737 posts, read 1,653,603 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by MickeyDickey View Post

I can't comment on Seattle, but I doubt few metro areas are as different from
city to suburb as Minneapolis is.
I would argue that most cities in the US will differ greatly from its core, to its suburbs, and even further out. I'm sure there are several metrics out there that would prove that (voting patterns, policy/planning, etc.), Minneapolis hardly has the market cornered regarding that phenomenon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Miami Beach, FL/Tokyo, Japan
1,699 posts, read 2,150,457 times
Reputation: 767
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandlapper View Post
I would argue that most cities in the US will differ greatly from its core, to its suburbs, and even further out. I'm sure there are several metrics out there that would prove that (voting patterns, policy/planning, etc.), Minneapolis hardly has the market cornered regarding that phenomenon.
Minneapolis is not very different from her suburbs, in fact it's one of the least extreme differences from the city and the suburbs. A good example of polarized cities are Detroit and her suburbs, Atlanta and her suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 05:35 PM
 
Location: District of Columbia
737 posts, read 1,653,603 times
Reputation: 487
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDPMiami View Post
Minneapolis is not very different from her suburbs, in fact it's one of the least extreme differences from the city and the suburbs. A good example of polarized cities are Detroit and her suburbs, Atlanta and her suburbs.
I would tend to agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-28-2015, 08:46 PM
 
7,132 posts, read 9,128,454 times
Reputation: 6338
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDPMiami View Post
Minneapolis is not very different from her suburbs, in fact it's one of the least extreme differences from the city and the suburbs. A good example of polarized cities are Detroit and her suburbs, Atlanta and her suburbs.
Well, it's easy when the vast majority of your metro is white and most of the minorities live in the city itself. Atlanta's metro is literally 34% Black...that's extremely high for metro of it's size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top