Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-10-2015, 07:24 AM
 
Location: Englewood, Near Eastside Indy
8,978 posts, read 17,284,870 times
Reputation: 7377

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post

Louisville wins with the waterfront, look, vibe and views.
I wish the "8664" movement had won out. Louisville could have done so much more with that riverfront land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-15-2015, 06:25 AM
 
191 posts, read 167,280 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
I disagree. Louisville blows KC out in every food metric from variety to restaurant strips to James Beard chefs to national press. I tell you what, post some links to the national press recognizing KC's food scene and produce lists ranking it as a top 20 foodie city.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111904265504576569120804320628

http://www.gq.com/life/food/201306/short-order-kansas-city-guide-patrick-ryan-port-fonda-interview

http://www.travelandleisure.com/slideshows/americas-best-cities-for-foodies/18

Last edited by yabanci; 06-15-2015 at 06:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 06:39 AM
 
191 posts, read 167,280 times
Reputation: 231
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
Look, KC is a great city. It just does not have nearly the "cool" factor nor the buzz that Louisville has built in the last decade.
National articles about KC's appeal:

www.nytimes.com/2010/05/16/travel/16hours.html

http://nymag.com/travel/weekends/kansascityurban/

http://hyperallergic.com/46641/art-world-road-trip-kansas-city/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/26/americas-top-5-cities-to-keep-on-your-radar_n_5811822.html

http://nypost.com/2013/06/25/kicking-it-in-kansas-city/



There are some international articles as well:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2293228/Americas-marvellous-Mid-West-visiting-Kansas-City.html

http://www.theguardian.com/travel/2014/sep/28/gone-girl-locations-kansas-city-missouri

http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20120711-kansas-citys-midwest-renaissance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 07:14 AM
 
Location: CHICAGO, Illinois
934 posts, read 1,440,843 times
Reputation: 1675
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter1948 View Post
I disagree. Louisville blows KC out in every food metric from variety to restaurant strips to James Beard chefs to national press. I tell you what, post some links to the national press recognizing KC's food scene and produce lists ranking it as a top 20 foodie city.
What? How does Louisville's food scene "blow" Kansas City out of the water? In the 2015 James Beard Awards, Louisville received two awards both of which where in Best of Southwest. Kansas received twice as many awards, including one for Best Pastry Chef and Most Outstanding Restaurant nationwide.

If that Travel and Leisure link up above is from 2015, it also ranks Louisville and Kansas City among the best food cities in the US...but Louisville is #16 and Kansas City is #3. Anthony Bourdain put a KC restaurant on his 13 Places to Eat Before You Die. KC gets featured in shows like Man vs Food and Andrew Zimmern has been praising KC's food scene for his show.

Don't get me wrong, Louisville is a good food city, but it is completely comparable to Kansas City, not to mention Kansas City has a well-known signature food. That said, some of those lists put Louisville and KC above places like New York and Chicago which is flattering...but a bit of a stretch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omahahonors View Post
No knock on the others. All are very good, very healthy cities.

But KC stands out to me as being the best of this bunch. The city has great jobs, a very good inner urban fabric and (like Omaha) is within an 8 hour drive to a very diverse array of some very cool places. More so than the others.
Indianapolis and Columbus are MUCH closer to a diverse array of big cities. Columbus is only 2-3 hours from Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Pittsburgh, not to mention Columbus itself.

Indianapolis is only 3 hours from Cincinnati, Louisville, and the crown jewel of the midwest, Chicago. Kansas City is the most remote of all these cities by far. Honestly, I think since Kansas City is the most remote it's made itself into kind of a mecca of Missouri/Kansas. It's the dominant city in the area and THE place to go. But in no way shape or form is it as centrally located as the other three cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:16 AM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by McdonaldIndy View Post
Seriously?
Lack of student life? Broad Ripple is the very definition of student life. Butler and other college students love Broad Ripple.
BroadRippleGuy defending Broad Ripple! lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2015, 11:39 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdAilment View Post
Indianapolis and Columbus are MUCH closer to a diverse array of big cities. Columbus is only 2-3 hours from Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Pittsburgh, not to mention Columbus itself.

Indianapolis is only 3 hours from Cincinnati, Louisville, and the crown jewel of the midwest, Chicago. Kansas City is the most remote of all these cities by far. Honestly, I think since Kansas City is the most remote it's made itself into kind of a mecca of Missouri/Kansas. It's the dominant city in the area and THE place to go. But in no way shape or form is it as centrally located as the other three cities.
Actually, it's the most centrally located major metropolitan area in the United States. (I get your point, but you didn't phrase it properly.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-16-2015, 09:30 AM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,972,699 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
Actually, it's the most centrally located major metropolitan area in the United States. (I get your point, but you didn't phrase it properly.)
I phrased it fine.

Kansas City may be more at the center of the United States, but Louisville, Indianapolis, and Columbus are centrally located to a lot of important midwest metro areas, and much closer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top