Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-28-2015, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
6,327 posts, read 9,112,650 times
Reputation: 4048

Advertisements

What was ever similar about Massachusetts and Virginia besides being commonwealths?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-28-2015, 04:50 PM
 
6,610 posts, read 8,990,283 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
What was ever similar about Massachusetts and Virginia besides being commonwealths?
Look back at some of the previous posts where it has already been discussed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2015, 06:54 PM
 
2,823 posts, read 4,464,349 times
Reputation: 1799
Some of the suburban areas of the Triad and Charlotte are actually super conservative, and definitely the towns just outside the two metros (i.e. Asheboro, Lexington, Salisbury). Even Wake County is probably more on the purple side. However, I'm sure it's a similar case in Virginia up around Roanoke, Lynchburg, and definitely Southwest Virginia closer to Bristol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-28-2015, 08:51 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
46,009 posts, read 53,247,583 times
Reputation: 15179
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeTarheel View Post
VA was one of the most populated and powerful states/colonies (like MA), while NC was one of the least populated and powerful. There were very few plantations in NC compared to VA, and very few cities compared to VA. The vast majority of NC was unpopulated.
Besides North Carolina not being that lightly populated at the time, your argument doesn't make sense. Rhode Island had and has much fewer people than Massachusetts, but it's obviously rather similar to Massachusetts. Texas and New York today are both states with large populations and influence, but no one would argue they have much similarity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 12:15 PM
 
2,823 posts, read 4,464,349 times
Reputation: 1799
I would still say Virginia has always been more similar to North Carolina, definitely over Massachusetts or any of the New England states. However, it's true that both North Carolina and Virginia weren't as similar before the Civil War. Virginia was very wealthy, you can drive around the state today and visit the estates/plantations of Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Robert E. Lee. You can definitely tell people had money in Virginia, plenty of grand tobacco plantations along the James River. North Carolina didn't really have these wealthy aristocratic figures, you won't find a Monticello in the Piedmont region of North Carolina because it was mainly populated by poor yeoman farmers. Virginia had wealthy people of English descent, which did exist in Eastern NC but not so much in the Piedmont or Western NC. Those regions were mainly filled with Scots-Irish. North Carolina was nicknamed, "The Ireland of the South" because we were seen as so backwoods and poor. Richmond was a very large and prominent city for the longest time, while Raleigh was just a puny state capital. Only Wilmington and some pockets of Eastern NC had all the wealth and plantations. Virginia officers even looked down on North Carolinians during the Civil War, and NC Governor Zeb Vance didn't want Virginians commanding North Carolina troops. Again, we were seen as so backwoods and poor. However, both North Carolina and Virginia are quite similar today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 01:00 PM
 
37,814 posts, read 41,601,817 times
Reputation: 27100
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayJayCB View Post
I would still say Virginia has always been more similar to North Carolina, definitely over Massachusetts or any of the New England states. However, it's true that both North Carolina and Virginia weren't as similar before the Civil War. Virginia was very wealthy, you can drive around the state today and visit the estates/plantations of Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Robert E. Lee. You can definitely tell people had money in Virginia, plenty of grand tobacco plantations along the James River. North Carolina didn't really have these wealthy aristocratic figures, you won't find a Monticello in the Piedmont region of North Carolina because it was mainly populated by poor yeoman farmers. Virginia had wealthy people of English descent, which did exist in Eastern NC but not so much in the Piedmont or Western NC. Those regions were mainly filled with Scots-Irish. North Carolina was nicknamed, "The Ireland of the South" because we were seen as so backwoods and poor. Richmond was a very large and prominent city for the longest time, while Raleigh was just a puny state capital. Only Wilmington and some pockets of Eastern NC had all the wealth and plantations. Virginia officers even looked down on North Carolinians during the Civil War, and NC Governor Zeb Vance didn't want Virginians commanding North Carolina troops. Again, we were seen as so backwoods and poor. However, both North Carolina and Virginia are quite similar today.
Historically, VA and SC were more similar and today, it's NC and VA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 01:27 PM
 
2,823 posts, read 4,464,349 times
Reputation: 1799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
Historically, VA and SC were more similar and today, it's NC and VA.
Yep, pretty much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 04:25 PM
 
6,610 posts, read 8,990,283 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
Besides North Carolina not being that lightly populated at the time, your argument doesn't make sense. Rhode Island had and has much fewer people than Massachusetts, but it's obviously rather similar to Massachusetts. Texas and New York today are both states with large populations and influence, but no one would argue they have much similarity.
NC being lightly populated isn't the only argument here...but several have already been made so I don't see much point in going back over them. No one said that they were exactly alike, but only that they had more in common than VA did with NC HISTORICALLY. Feel free to click on any of the links below comparing MA and VA historically:

http://trendsupdates.com/the-virgini...d-differences/
http://www.studymode.com/essays/Simi...ia-649619.html
http://www.studymode.com/essays/Mass...on-190362.html
http://www.researchomatic.com/Coloni...ay-152545.html

There is more information but these are a good start.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 06:07 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,127 posts, read 13,147,342 times
Reputation: 10103
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradjl2009 View Post
What was ever similar about Massachusetts and Virginia besides being commonwealths?
Virginia was the first English colony in the South and Massachusetts Bay/Plymouth Colony was the first English colony in the North. I am talking way back in the early 1600s. So they probably had a lot of influence on the way the South and North are today. I think this is especially true of Virginia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-29-2015, 06:11 PM
 
6,610 posts, read 8,990,283 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
Virginia was the first English colony in the South and Massachusetts Bay/Plymouth Colony was the first English colony in the North. I am talking way back in the early 1600s. So they probably had a lot of influence on the way the South and North are today. I think this is especially true of Virginia.
Good point. There are many similarities like the one you mention above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top