Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-22-2015, 04:14 PM
 
10 posts, read 9,590 times
Reputation: 13

Advertisements

For example, how much more land would Houston need to annex to reach Chicago's population?

Last edited by bizycity; 09-22-2015 at 04:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2015, 07:01 PM
 
124 posts, read 147,332 times
Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizycity View Post
For example, how much more land would Houston need to annex to reach Chicago's population?
Pennsylvania and the rest of New Jersey. Just kidding, I don't think we're number two anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 07:40 PM
 
Location: Katy,Texas
6,470 posts, read 4,070,030 times
Reputation: 4522
Not that much jut annexed unincorporated NW houston areas of Cy-Fair/ Spring and everything in between and that would add the 400,000-700,000 the city needed to have
http://www.cfisd.net/en/contact/district-map/ -500,000-700,000 people live within those boundaries
https://www.google.com/maps/dir/30.1...ff9109!1m0!3e0
Somehwere between 1 and 2 million people live in the highlighted area and 85%+ of the area can be annexed by Houston. Cy-fair alone has 188 square miles of some estimating 700,000 people to 500,000 people which alone would pass up Chicago.
I say Houston needs to annex a select 200 square miles around it without even touching any incorporated cities to have more people than Chicago and with natural growth by next census it is more like 100 square miles, this is just based on the 2010 official population. To be honest Houston could have the exactly same square miles if it dropped a considerable amount of the east side and even parts of the west side like George Bush and Addicks Reservoir where 3,000 people live in like 100 square miles all of Houston. it could also trade many of it's lower density areas for areas of higher density right next to it. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Ho...0d02def365053b

Last edited by NigerianNightmare; 09-22-2015 at 07:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Tucson/Nogales
23,218 posts, read 29,031,323 times
Reputation: 32620
The Las Vegas Valley is comprised of 2.07 million, but the city of Las Vegas is a mere 475,000. There's Henderson to the east/south with 250,000 and North Las Vegas with 175,000 and unincorporated Clark County with the rest.

When you visit Las Vegas, and you stay on the Las Vegas Strip, you are not staying in the city of Las Vegas, remember that, you are staying in unincorporated Clark County. There's a huge Clark County government complex downtown, along with the City of Las Vegas government complex, and why, oh why, don't they just combine the 2?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2015, 09:40 PM
 
Location: USA
2,753 posts, read 3,311,159 times
Reputation: 2192
Hartford's only 18 square miles. Since CT has some crazy annex laws, we have some weird borders. Hartford's population is only 125,000 but if you include West Hartford and East Hartford you'll get a combination of roughly 250,000 which is bigger than Richmond and just as big as Buffalo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 12:36 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque, NM
707 posts, read 749,568 times
Reputation: 441
Albuquerque always has the option to annex the South Valley, which uses Albuquerque as the postal address. At 50,000 it would be enough to push it past Las Vegas. That's Las Vegas, Nevada, not Las Vegas, NM.

Of course if they were to instead incorporate, South Valley would be the seventh largest city in New Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Louisville
5,294 posts, read 6,059,103 times
Reputation: 9623
If Grand Rapids were to merge with its largest suburb Wyoming it would have 270k people in 70sq mi, putting it between Orlando and Lincoln NE, with less land area than both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 12:54 PM
 
93,241 posts, read 123,876,708 times
Reputation: 18258
Quote:
Originally Posted by HumpDay View Post
Hartford's only 18 square miles. Since CT has some crazy annex laws, we have some weird borders. Hartford's population is only 125,000 but if you include West Hartford and East Hartford you'll get a combination of roughly 250,000 which is bigger than Richmond and just as big as Buffalo.
Northeastern and many Midwestern cities are in the same or similar situation due to adjacent cities/towns/townships being incorporated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 01:38 PM
 
Location: BMORE!
10,106 posts, read 9,961,782 times
Reputation: 5779
Baltimore is an independent city, so It couldn't annex even if it wanted to.

Interesting fact: no town in Baltimore County and Howard County is incorporated although they all look and function, and in many cases, identify as their own. Also, many of the county seats in Virginia are actually independent of the county it is in, so the county seat is a separate municipality than the county the surrounds it and therefore not in a county at all. Like how Beverly Hills is separate from LA even though it is technically inside of LA.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-23-2015, 02:53 PM
 
124 posts, read 147,332 times
Reputation: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by KodeBlue View Post
Baltimore is an independent city, so It couldn't annex even if it wanted to.

Interesting fact: no town in Baltimore County and Howard County is incorporated although they all look and function, and in many cases, identify as their own. Also, many of the county seats in Virginia are actually independent of the county it is in, so the county seat is a separate municipality than the county the surrounds it and therefore not in a county at all. Like how Beverly Hills is separate from LA even though it is technically inside of LA.
Is the second largest city surrounded by county limits usually the county seat? (or the second biggest that's near the center) Are there still old county seat buildings in the independent city or did this happen so long ago that there usually aren't? Maybe they're used as city hall, the city courthouse etc. now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top