Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2016, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078

Advertisements

I don't think I've seen a thread on this before. This is sort of similar to Richard Florida's "Creative Class" only I've decided to focus a bit more narrowly on just 24 EEO codes (financial manager, architect, chemist, chemical engineer, accountant, physician, attorney, post-secondary teacher, microbiologist, economist, software developer, computer programmer, food scientist, psychologist, etc.). It's far from a finished product so bear with me. I will keep expanding the list. But the results for now look this way.

Data is 2010 ACS estimates. I know that's decades ago in C-D world but it's the most recent data available. In parentheses is the percentage of the civilian workforce.

New York - 852,020 (9.56%)
Los Angeles - 473,925 (7.94%)
Bay Area - 412,420 (13.75%)
Chicago - 383,420 (8.53%)
Washington - 357,480 (12.37%)
Boston - 284,205 (12.21%)
Philadelphia - 256,905 (9.09%)
Dallas - 241,330 (8.01%)
Houston - 208,750 (7.69%)
Atlanta - 197,190 (7.93%)
Seattle - 186,555 (10.92%)
Miami - 164,795 (6.42%)
Detroit - 137,595 (7.27%)
Raleigh - 89,915 (11.48%)
Pittsburgh - 88,540 (7.90%)
Cleveland - 75,910 (7.73%)

Added a few smaller metros.

Last edited by BajanYankee; 01-25-2016 at 05:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2016, 06:02 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,957,401 times
Reputation: 6059
Interesting. I wonder how Las Vegas, San Diego and Denver are doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 06:15 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,686,093 times
Reputation: 15078
Revised to include civil engineers, petroleum engineers, financial analysts and editors.

New York - 916,115 (10.27%)
Los Angeles - 492,860 (8.26%)
Bay Area - 428,375 (14.28%)
Chicago - 404,425 (8.99%)
Washington - 381,200 (13.19%)
Boston - 294,640 (12.66%)
Philadelphia - 270,075 (9.56%)
Dallas - 253,020 (8.40%)
Houston - 232,715 (8.57%)
Atlanta - 201,960 (8.13%)
Seattle - 197,280 (11.55%)
Miami - 170,865 (6.67%)
Detroit - 144,095 (7.62%)
Raleigh - 94,765 (12.09%)
Pittsburgh - 93,345 (8.33%)
Cleveland - 78,890 (8.04%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 06:33 PM
 
2,262 posts, read 2,397,268 times
Reputation: 2741
Considering Raleigh is a smaller metro area, 12% is not bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:05 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOVA_guy View Post
Considering Raleigh is a smaller metro area, 12% is not bad.
No surprise to me. It's also not a surprise to me that Miami's is the lowest. I'm in both cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:22 PM
 
1,099 posts, read 1,427,737 times
Reputation: 608
Super interesting concept; keep it going!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle Area, NC
6,376 posts, read 5,489,331 times
Reputation: 10038
Does "Raleigh" include the whole Triangle region (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill CSA)...if not I'm sure it would rank even higher if it did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:03 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by TarHeelNick View Post
Does "Raleigh" include the whole Triangle region (Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill CSA)...if not I'm sure it would rank even higher if it did.
If 89,915 represents 11.48% of the workforce, then that workforce would be 783,232. That number sounds like the Triangle's entire civilian workforce as of the 2010 Census. Regarding that stat, it would exclude all the scientists and creative class workers in the state government and those who work for the public universities as well if the below linked definition is true. Given that the number of both state government and university researchers and scientists make up a larger percentage of total employees in metros like the Triangle that are both state capitals and have the state's largest research universities, I'd guess that the percentage impact would be significant to the upside for the entire Raleigh-Durham area.

What is civilian labor force? definition and meaning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:11 PM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,955,180 times
Reputation: 7983
I'd like to see Phoenix, Vegas and San Diego
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Florida
2,232 posts, read 2,117,390 times
Reputation: 1910
Don't put florida metros up!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top