|

02-22-2008, 07:53 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
69 posts, read 64,018 times
Reputation: 24
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davfar
.hartford.
|
and Bridgeport
|
|

02-22-2008, 08:00 PM
|
|
Satirist
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: TwilightZone
5,304 posts, read 1,544,901 times
Reputation: 1031
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TENN24
and Bridgeport
|
What about Stamford?
Man I always thought CT was upper upper,like snobby 
|
|

02-22-2008, 08:11 PM
|
|
ma'am? do you mind if I work on my pick-up line?
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: still in exile......
29,521 posts, read 2,937,289 times
Reputation: 5431
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by miamiman
South Scottsdale! Homes there are worth less than $500,000. And there are Hispanics!!!
|
you got something against hispanics?
|
|

02-22-2008, 09:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
375 posts, read 426,850 times
Reputation: 107
|
|
|
Plank Road, Senic Highway, Scotland Avenue.
|
|

02-23-2008, 02:01 PM
|
|
Florida Rules!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: O-Town
1,787 posts, read 1,620,995 times
Reputation: 341
|
|
|
Opa Locka Florida
|
|

02-24-2008, 06:45 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
69 posts, read 64,018 times
Reputation: 24
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuckPA
What about Stamford?
Man I always thought CT was upper upper,like snobby 
|
Connecticut has perhaps the richest suburbs in the U.S., but some really bad cities though. Stamford is the exception, with median home prices exceeding half a million dollars. Stamford, and that whole area is extremely wealthy, but the cities of Bridgeport and Hartford are not.
|
|

02-24-2008, 08:28 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
745 posts
Reputation: 135
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWereRabbit
Utica too.
Honestly, theres no area of Boston I'd really avoid but I guess you'd have to say Mattapan, Dorchester, and Roxbury. Well, certain areas of each. Chelsea and Everett are essentially rough areas in Boston too. Other cities in Mass that might make the list are Lowell, Lawrence, Brockton, New Bedford, Fall River, Springfield, Holyoke, Chicopee.
|
Don't forget Southie, Fitchburg, and Haverhill (I've heard this place is rough.) Also while not super rough, but there is a large portion of psuedo tough kids that live in Southern New Hampshire. I have always thought it sucks, especially Manchester!
|
|

02-24-2008, 08:31 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
745 posts
Reputation: 135
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuckPA
What about Stamford?
Man I always thought CT was upper upper,like snobby 
|
hahaha not even close! The places nearest New York City is where all the wealth is in CT. However, most of nothern CT is just like upstate new york. There is nothing out there but small towns and farms. It is like the South of the North haha. Nothing but Casinos and farms.
|
|

02-25-2008, 02:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
330 posts, read 434,076 times
Reputation: 93
|
|
|
The overall worst part of Dallas is South Dallas including the Fair Park area.
|
|

02-25-2008, 03:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The better side of the Mason-Dixon Line
1,998 posts, read 1,851,561 times
Reputation: 517
|
|
|
In Maryland, I would avoid Baltimore City outside of the Inner Harbor, Fells Point, Little Italy, the Univ of Maryland-Baltimore campus and Camden areas. Also, I would avoid large segments of Prince George's County next to DC, in particular Langley Park, District Heights, Capitol Heights, Oxon Hill, and Suitland.
Also I would avoid Maryland highway 210 around PG and Charles Counties because apparently people like to illegally drag race there.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|