U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2016, 06:34 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
7,595 posts, read 4,025,752 times
Reputation: 2933

Advertisements

Crime In America: States With The Most Murders - WorldAtlas.com


SC has 19th highest number, Alaska 41st. Alaska only 40 murders. California had 1,699. So Alaska had 2.3 percent of the murders in California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2016, 06:52 PM
 
5,767 posts, read 10,310,136 times
Reputation: 3813
Quote:
thus, you are more likely to get murdered in California
No. "Likelihood" is another way of saying "probability." Probability means incidents per unit of population. In this case, murders per 100,000. It's more probable to get murdered in Alaska than California.

To put it another way, imagine if you had a normal six-sided die. If you roll 1 through 5, you're fine. But if you roll 6, you're dead. So your odds of death are 1 out of 6. Now imagine that you have a 100-sided die. On this die, 5 different surfaces result in death if you roll them. That's 4 more death surfaces than the first die. But, since it is 5 out of 100, your chances of rolling for death are only 1 out of 20, rather than 1 out of 6.

Same principle with murder rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 07:25 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
12,448 posts, read 11,955,665 times
Reputation: 10561
It's true that all things considered, if you are in a place with a higher population density, the average person will see more people in the course of the day. This raises your chance of seeing a murderer versus living in an out-of-the way rural area, even if the overall murder rate is the same.

However, a chance of seeing a murderer isn't the same thing as a chance of being murdered. The latter can be estimated fairly well just by the odds. How dense an area is doesn't play a role at all. Most people who are murdered are killed by someone they know anyway, not a stranger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
7,595 posts, read 4,025,752 times
Reputation: 2933
the probability you get murdered is increased by an increase in the number of criminals in your area. you cannot deny this

there is no such thing as a 'murder rate'. you are abritarily deciding to compare number of murders to the number of people. there is no reason that you have to do this. that ratio does not tell you anything about your chances of being murdered. it is basic logic that the way to mizmize your chance of being murder is to live near less criminals. Alaska only has 2 percent of the murders of California, thus is much more safe. the populuation denisity is also much lower so you have less chance of interacting with the criminals that do exist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 08:19 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh, PA (Morningside)
12,448 posts, read 11,955,665 times
Reputation: 10561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
the probability you get murdered is increased by an increase in the number of criminals in your area. you cannot deny this

there is no such thing as a 'murder rate'. you are arbitrarily deciding to compare number of murders to the number of people. there is no reason that you have to do this. that ratio does not tell you anything about your chances of being murdered. it is basic logic that the way to minimize your chance of being murder is to live near less criminals. Alaska only has 2 percent of the murders of California, thus is much more safe. the population density is also much lower so you have less chance of interacting with the criminals that do exist.
It's true in denser places there will be a larger number of criminals. But there is also a much, much higher number of potential victims.

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that all murders are random. In one state there are 500 murderers and 500,000 potential victims. In the other state there are 5,000 murderers and 50,000,000 potential victims. The murder rate in the first state should be 10 times higher. The bigger state has 10 times as many murderers, but 100 times as many potential victims. It's thus safer, because even though there are more killers on the street, the chances are much higher they will pick someone else besides you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2016, 11:31 PM
 
922 posts, read 1,018,557 times
Reputation: 750
This is why you can't go by number of murders.

State X population - 10,000,000 murders = 501
State Y population - 5,000,000 murders = 500

One more murder in State X than in State Y, but with a population that was twice as small, someone was twice as likely to be murdered in State Y.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2016, 01:32 AM
 
Location: Greenville SC 'Waterfall City'
7,595 posts, read 4,025,752 times
Reputation: 2933
you can go by number of murders. 40 murders in Alaska is a lot less murders than 1700 in california. you are more likely be be murdered in a state that has hundres of murders more than another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2016, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, formerly DC and Phila
8,569 posts, read 12,688,681 times
Reputation: 8334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simpsonvilllian View Post
you can go by number of murders. 40 murders in Alaska is a lot less murders than 1700 in california. you are more likely be be murdered in a state that has hundres of murders more than another.
Population of Alaska - 738,432 minus 40 murders = 738,392 safe, non-murdered people in Alaska
Population of California - 39,144,818 minus 1700 murders = 39,143,118 safe, non-murdered people in California.

Therefore, California is safer because you are more likely to be safer in a state that has millions more non-murdered people than another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2016, 09:14 AM
 
133 posts, read 90,454 times
Reputation: 47
in Louisiana ! whoa, must be the black on black in New Orleans ?? geez
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2016, 12:57 PM
nei nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Long Island / NYC
45,992 posts, read 42,048,502 times
Reputation: 14811
Quote:
Originally Posted by tablemtn View Post
No. "Likelihood" is another way of saying "probability." Probability means incidents per unit of population. In this case, murders per 100,000. It's more probable to get murdered in Alaska than California.

To put it another way, imagine if you had a normal six-sided die. If you roll 1 through 5, you're fine. But if you roll 6, you're dead. So your odds of death are 1 out of 6. Now imagine that you have a 100-sided die. On this die, 5 different surfaces result in death if you roll them. That's 4 more death surfaces than the first die. But, since it is 5 out of 100, your chances of rolling for death are only 1 out of 20, rather than 1 out of 6.

Same principle with murder rates.
Murder rate isn't a good way to measure chance of getting murdered; murder is highly non-random. Most murders are between people who know each other or at least in the same social circle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top