Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-23-2017, 10:06 PM
 
201 posts, read 220,033 times
Reputation: 235

Advertisements

Well, I go by city limits. If you go by that definition, any city with a population of 200,000 or more within the city limits would qualify as a major city. So, some of the smallest major cities that come to mind would be Columbus, GA; Fayetteville, NC; Birmingham, AL; Arlington, VA; etc. Akron, OH; Providence, RI; Knoxville, TN; Grand Rapids, MI; etc. are some examples of mid-sized cities that are close to achieving major city status (or held it at one time, but experienced a population shrinkage).

Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
I think some people are confusing "major" city with "global" or "world class" city. The threshold for being a major city is much lower than being a world class or global city. I would consider Phoenix, Cleveland, and Minneapolis to be major cities but wouldn't consider them to be world class at all.
I agree with this, I get sick of people always giving the same three U.S. cities all of the attention as if they are the only true major cities in America. Now a world-class city would have to be a city with a population of at least a million people within the city limits (in which case Phoenix could slide), but maybe two million people is really the right criteria. If you go by the latter definition, there are only four world-class cities in the U.S.

Last edited by Metal To The Core; 10-23-2017 at 10:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-23-2017, 10:20 PM
 
Location: North Dakota
10,349 posts, read 13,943,865 times
Reputation: 18268
I never considered Las Vegas to really be a major city. Sure, it's a big city, but when you think about it, other than gambling, what really is the major industry there? It just doesn't seem like it has much of the features you would expect in a big city.

As far as the smallest major city it seems that Austin would qualify. Quite a bit going on there. I also wonder if Omaha would count as a major city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-23-2017, 11:10 PM
 
11,445 posts, read 10,481,607 times
Reputation: 6283
I actually think city proper is best for this discussion. New Orleans punching above its weight is entirely because of what's in its city limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 05:05 AM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,601,062 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDak15 View Post
I never considered Las Vegas to really be a major city. Sure, it's a big city, but when you think about it, other than gambling, what really is the major industry there? It just doesn't seem like it has much of the features you would expect in a big city.

As far as the smallest major city it seems that Austin would qualify. Quite a bit going on there. I also wonder if Omaha would count as a major city.
Law is the big Industry outside of gambling in Vegas, you trip over law firms left and right there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 06:18 AM
 
7,070 posts, read 16,744,788 times
Reputation: 3559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kmanshouse View Post
I'd say forget stats for a question like this. Anybody can look up numbers and draw a line. Seems this is an opinion question based on perception.

I'd say the largest major city I consider "small" is Indianapolis. I know its population is up there and it has tons of sports, etc, but it feels pretty small for a major city.

The non-major city that feels the biggest to me is Louisville. When you take I-65 south and cross the Ohio, there appears to be a major skyline along it that feels like a pretty massive city. Also, driving into Louisville feels like you are hitting a big place. I was shocked to see it had only 253,000 people in the city proper and 1.2M in the metro.
Louisville has 600,000 in city and 1.3 million metro, 1.5 million CSA. It's a big city IMO if you consider Indianapolis one
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 07:04 AM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal To The Core View Post
Well, I go by city limits. If you go by that definition, any city with a population of 200,000 or more within the city limits would qualify as a major city. So, some of the smallest major cities that come to mind would be Columbus, GA; Fayetteville, NC; Birmingham, AL; Arlington, VA; etc.
So you actually and truly believe that Columbus and Fayetteville are major cities while Salt Lake City is not???? That's asinine.

And Arlington isn't even a city; it's a county and functions as an extension of DC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 08:01 AM
 
Location: South Padre Island, TX
2,452 posts, read 2,302,894 times
Reputation: 1386
Houston has so much infrastructure woes that I just can't bring myself to class it as a major city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 08:03 AM
 
448 posts, read 592,191 times
Reputation: 257
Smallest I consider major.....St.Louis, Kansas City, Cleveland

Largest I consider smaller....Austin, Sacramento,San Jose
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 08:22 AM
 
201 posts, read 220,033 times
Reputation: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
So you actually and truly believe that Columbus and Fayetteville are major cities while Salt Lake City is not???? That's asinine.

And Arlington isn't even a city; it's a county and functions as an extension of DC.
Well, if you go look up "best cities" or "worst cities" or "most dangerous cities" or whatever lists, they often say that they're looking specifically at cities with a population of 200,000 or more. If you look some place up on travelmath.com, they'll have a list of major cities nearby defined as cities with a population of 200,000, so there you go...

Salt Lake City is a more recognizable name for sure, and probably has more big city elements to it, but that's often the threshold. If that bothers you that much, why don't you convince 5,000 Columbus residents and 5,000 Fayetteville residents to move over to Salt Lake City? I didn't determine the population of those cities myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2017, 08:39 AM
 
37,882 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metal To The Core View Post
Well, if you go look up "best cities" or "worst cities" or "most dangerous cities" or whatever lists, they often say that they're looking specifically at cities with a population of 200,000 or more. If you look some place up on travelmath.com, they'll have a list of major cities nearby defined as cities with a population of 200,000, so there you go...
If you're basing your threshold for what's considered "major" on clickbait articles, then I really don't know what to say.

Quote:
Salt Lake City is a more recognizable name for sure, and probably has more big city elements to it, but that's often the threshold. If that bothers you that much, why don't you convince 5,000 Columbus residents and 5,000 Fayetteville residents to move over to Salt Lake City? I didn't determine the population of those cities myself.
Of course you didn't but that's not the point. When it comes to municipal population, much of that is determined by state laws that regulate how cities are able to annex, city-county consolidation, etc. Using a standard metric like MSA is a much, much better way to determine major city status.

Economy, amenities, infrastructure, etc. play much bigger roles when it comes to being "major" than just municipal population. Cities can annex to the hinterlands to get 200,000 people but that means next to nothing in the grand scheme of things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top