Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Salem is not tiny but it's no major metro either. It's the 3rd largest city in Oregon but even its metro is smaller than Portland's city limits.
I agree it's no major metro. But from the original message, which said 'small town capitals', and adding population (city only, although I normally consider metro areas the true measure of a region) straight off Wikipedia:
"Small town capitals
Olympia, WA - 42,514
Salem, OR - 136,924
Carson City, NV - 52,457
Helena, MT - 25,780
Cheyenne, WY - 53,011
Santa Fe, NM - 62,203
Pierre, SD - 13,876
Bismarck, ND - 55,532
Jefferson City, MO - 40,771
Frankfort, KY - 27,741
Charleston, WV - 53,421
Dover, DE - 35,811
Concord, NH - 40,765
Montpelier, VT - 8,035
Augusta, ME - 18,560
Juneau, AK - 30,711
Annapolis, MD - 36,524
Agree Salem isn't huge-it's barely a 'city' as opposed to a large town. But it IS a city, and has a population of ~3 to ~15 times the size of these other state capitals that are considered 'small.'
Having grown up in an Oregon city of 50,000-ish (Corvallis), I can tell you Salem and Eugene in Oregon are head and shoulders above cities in the 40-50k range.
If you want a large city in Oregon, go to Portland; that's your only choice. If you want a small city, go to Eugene-Springfield or Salem areas. If you want a hefty town-burbs of Portland, Corvallis, Medford, and Bend is making a pretty good run at it lately.
I agree it's no major metro. But from the original message, which said 'small town capitals', and adding population (city only, although I normally consider metro areas the true measure of a region) straight off Wikipedia:
"Small town capitals
Olympia, WA - 42,514
Salem, OR - 136,924
Carson City, NV - 52,457
Helena, MT - 25,780
Cheyenne, WY - 53,011
Santa Fe, NM - 62,203
Pierre, SD - 13,876
Bismarck, ND - 55,532
Jefferson City, MO - 40,771
Frankfort, KY - 27,741
Charleston, WV - 53,421
Dover, DE - 35,811
Concord, NH - 40,765
Montpelier, VT - 8,035
Augusta, ME - 18,560
Juneau, AK - 30,711
Annapolis, MD - 36,524
Agree Salem isn't huge-it's barely a 'city' as opposed to a large town. But it IS a city, and has a population of ~3 to ~15 times the size of these other state capitals that are considered 'small.'
Having grown up in an Oregon city of 50,000-ish (Corvallis), I can tell you Salem and Eugene in Oregon are head and shoulders above cities in the 40-50k range.
If you want a large city in Oregon, go to Portland; that's your only choice. If you want a small city, go to Eugene-Springfield or Salem areas. If you want a hefty town-burbs of Portland, Corvallis, Medford, and Bend is making a pretty good run at it lately.
Despite the fact that I split my time between Miami Beach and Raleigh, I was born in Corvallis.
The capitals were usually chosen to be in the geographic center, or close to it. In Early American times, it might have been several days' journey to get there. Cities weren't as large, then. Commerce tended to take place near the coasts and navigable waterways, which were on the edge. And in fact they may have been larger in population share when founded. Carson City was probably more important as a gold mining center when that was Nevada's leading industry. And did you know that Prescott AZ was the territorial capital before it became a State? OK, that belongs on the history thread.
However, I think Pierre, Dover, and Juneau are the only three state capitols not in close proximity to an interstate highway.
Jefferson City is 30 miles away from the nearest interstate, and 80-90 years away from the 21st century. Come watch the ritual rolling up of High Street at 5:15 pm. Listen to that lonesome whistle blow as freight trains pass within 50 feet of the Capitol building. Check out the phone book with five last names (ok, maybe 10) predominating.
And while it doesn't win the prize for fewest people, it's got to be in the top 5.
Forget about theories why it's not a larger town-- the capital was moved there from St. Charles because it was on the Missouri River and the land was cheap, because it was hilly and rocky and useless for farming. No one moves there except to work in state government, and even then, I'd bet that most state employees don't live there, but commute from 10-60 miles away. US 63 between Columbia and Jeff is a high-speed commuter highway at rush hour, and I know lots of people who commute from California (the town) (look it up), Holts Summit, Kingdom City, even Mexico (the town) (look it up) and Osage Beach (where there is no beach). Not to mention Lupus and Frankenstein. If you want to buy a house cheap, Jeff is a great place to look. A lot of apartments rent for $300-350 a month.
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,047,399 times
Reputation: 4047
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProperMan
Most state's capitals are less populated than largest city in the state.
E.g. NY capital is Albany population 95 000, biggest town is New York City population is 8 000 000.
And this true for most states i checked, why its so?
The Philosophy back during the founding time was that we keep the government and the business sectors apart from each other.
Some cities like Atlanta, Phoenix, Austin, Sacramento, Denver, Oklahoma City, Indianapolis, Columbus, Nashville, Little Rock, Anchorage, Honolulu, and our National Capital Washington DC.
^ The above mentioned cities are both the largest cities in their respective states, state capital cities in their respective states, and relative business centers in their respective states, with the exception of the ones in bold- those are not the largest cities in their state but are still a combination of state capital city + Business relevant city.
The Philosophy back during the founding time was that we keep the government and the business sectors apart from each other.
Some cities like Atlanta, Phoenix, Austin, Sacramento, Denver, Oklahoma City, Indianapolis, Columbus, Nashville, Little Rock, Anchorage, Honolulu, and our National Capital Washington DC.
^ The above mentioned cities are both the largest cities in their respective states, state capital cities in their respective states, and relative business centers in their respective states, with the exception of the ones in bold- those are not the largest cities in their state but are still a combination of state capital city + Business relevant city.
Raleigh and Richmond fit that latter mold as well.
The Philosophy back during the founding time was that we keep the government and the business sectors apart from each other.
Some cities like Atlanta, Phoenix, Austin, Sacramento, Denver, Oklahoma City, Indianapolis, Columbus, Nashville, Little Rock, Anchorage, Honolulu, and our National Capital Washington DC.
^ The above mentioned cities are both the largest cities in their respective states, state capital cities in their respective states, and relative business centers in their respective states, with the exception of the ones in bold- those are not the largest cities in their state but are still a combination of state capital city + Business relevant city.
Good general idea, but Anchorage isn't a capital and this list is missing Boston, Providence, Hartford, Salt Lake City, Jackson, Boise, Des Moines, St. Paul (Twin Cities are a bit funny), Columbia Charleston, and Cheyenne. Madison and Baton Rouge also fit the bill for capitals that depend on a lot more than the service industry and the state government for its livelihood.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.