Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you are speaking of cities that are compact, but still have sprawling suburbs, then the answer would be San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, perhaps even Miami and Tampa when you look at city limits.
What major American city lacks a core? Even cities with a ton of annexed land in their current boundaries, such as Jacksonville, tend to have a historic/semi-urban center.
If you are speaking of cities that are compact, but still have sprawling suburbs, then the answer would be San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, perhaps even Miami and Tampa when you look at city limits.
Minneapolis before either of these. I see what you're getting at, though.
If you are speaking of cities that are compact, but still have sprawling suburbs, then the answer would be San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, perhaps even Miami and Tampa when you look at city limits.
In terms of density and a more walkable factor I would say Boston and DC are pretty equivalent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.