Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's roughly 70 per sq. mile where I am in VT, and that's too crowded for me. My land I'll move to in the near future is in a place with 0.10 per sq. mile (yes you read that right) and even that could be better (less dense)...
I love your thinking. That's the kind of density I like. You got a rep point from me. I'll be moving to North Dakota in a couple of years and just love the low density and wide open plains - to me that's heaven on earth and the way people were meant to live.
A previous poster mentioned that one of the counties in New Jersey had a population density of over 13000 per square mile. That number seems extremely high, but if true, that would be hell on earth to me. I can not even conceive of living in that kind of environment.
I love your thinking. That's the kind of density I like. You got a rep point from me. I'll be moving to North Dakota in a couple of years and just love the low density and wide open plains - to me that's heaven on earth and the way people were meant to live.
A previous poster mentioned that one of the counties in New Jersey had a population density of over 13000 per square mile. That number seems extremely high, but if true, that would be hell on earth to me. I can not even conceive of living in that kind of environment.
i grew up in a city in nj that had 40,000 per sq mile. (city was 3 sq miles, but 1 was uninhabited and pop was 80,000 at the time) LOVED IT! my 450 per sq mile now feels like the middle of nowhere - couldn't imagine living in anything less than that - I'd go crazy.
i grew up in a city in nj that had 40,000 per sq mile. (city was 3 sq miles, but 1 was uninhabited and pop was 80,000 at the time) LOVED IT! my 450 per sq mile now feels like the middle of nowhere - couldn't imagine living in anything less than that - I'd go crazy.
I'd go insane if I spent more than a day in that. I spent one day in NYC once, and I was close to insane by the end of the day. Wall to wall people, and talk about pollution!
I'd go insane if I spent more than a day in that. I spent one day in NYC once, and I was close to insane by the end of the day. Wall to wall people, and talk about pollution!
isn't it great we have the choice in this country on where we can live!
I'd go insane if I spent more than a day in that. I spent one day in NYC once, and I was close to insane by the end of the day. Wall to wall people, and talk about pollution!
We are constantly talking about city density on this board. However, I did a search to see if there were any lists that provided the density of an entire state. Just curious as to what your thoughts are.
I think that New Jersey would take the prize here, but what about Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, Delaware, possibly
Ohio and Florida.
Texas has a large population, but also large land area, same with California.
What do you think??
Ohio is dense. Oh wait your talking about population, I would say New Jersey.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
my 450 per sq mile now feels like the middle of nowhere - couldn't imagine living in anything less than that - I'd go crazy.
