Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep, this is the point I was making earlier in this thread.
I could be wrong but I just don’t see them going anywhere in Georgia, North Carolina, etc. A lot of these big tech corporations are pretty elitist, there’s no way they’d go to a red state no matter how liberal a city within that state maybe.
I'd like to hope Amazon is bit more sophisticated in its analysis than the very simplistic "red state" v. "blue state" nonsense (which are social constructs contrived by the media that have seriously done more destruction to our social and political discourse over the past 15-20 years than anything else I can think of).
Yes, I completely understand that a factor like protections for the LGBT community means a lot to Amazon, as it should (and Amazon, if it was so politically inclined, could actually use its desire for progressive policy as a bargaining chip to influence state policies where they are deficient--otherwise, they are completely throwing away an opportunity to make change).
But overall, outside of state approval for something like financial incentives, it's local politics that matter most in the scheme of things. Obviously Atlanta doesn't automatically equate to Georgia just as Seattle doesn't automatically equate to Washington State.
I'd like to hope Amazon is bit more sophisticated in its analysis than the very simplistic "red state" v. "blue state" nonsense (which are social constructs contrived by the media that have seriously done more destruction to our social and political discourse over the past 15-20 years than anything else I can think of).
Yes, I completely understand that a factor like protections for the LGBT community means a lot to Amazon, as it should (and Amazon, if it was so politically inclined, could actually use its desire for progressive policy as a bargaining chip to influence state policies where they are deficient--otherwise, they are completely throwing away an opportunity to make change).
But overall, outside of state approval for something like financial incentives, it's local politics that matters most in the scheme of things. Obviously Atlanta doesn't automatically equate to Georgia just as Seattle doesn't automatically equate to Washington State.
Calling a state a “red state” or “blue state” is a simple term to describe what can be pretty complex which is a state and their politics. Politics matter when it comes to business especially in the Trump era, it’s easy to dismiss it but it’s actially pretty consequential and matters when large corporations are looking at where to relocate.
Calling a state a “red state” or “blue state” is a simple term to describe what can be pretty complex which is a state and their politics. Politics matter when it comes to business especially in the Trump era, it’s easy to dismiss it but it’s actially pretty consequential and matters when large corporations are looking at where to relocate.
Right. I'm not dismissing the importance of politics, but no two states are the same, even among "red states" and "blue states."
And Tip O'Neill's truism about all politics being local still very much applies in business decisions. No matter where Amazon locates, it's going to be interacting FAR more often with City Hall than the State Capital.
Right. I'm not dismissing the importance of politics, but no two states are the same, even among "red states" and "blue states."
And Tip O'Neill's truism about all politics being local still very much applies in business decisions. No matter where Amazon locates, it's going to be interacting FAR more often with City Hall than the State Capital.
It will be interacting with the city, but the state level laws still apply. Look at all the southern states passing statewide laws that overpower the local progressive cities' decisions. From the Confederate monuments to LGBT ordinances to marijuana laws and more. Austin and Atlanta are safe havens for liberals and minorities in the regions, but their state governments could still, at any point, strip the minorities of their civil rights. Why risk that when you can just plop your HQ into a liberal state and never worry whether or not your LGBT employees will be discriminated against one day?
It will be interacting with the city, but the state level laws still apply. Look at all the southern states passing statewide laws that overpower the local progressive cities' decisions.
That's a fair point about states usurping local authority, but on the contrary, you can bet Amazon would have significant leverage over any state in which it chooses to locate.
For example, I think that both the Texas and Georgia legislatures would be changing their socially conservative tune pretty quickly if Amazon made an offer to locate in either Austin/Dallas or Atlanta, respectively, contingent upon passage of state-level LGBT protections. Can you imagine how ridiculous any state would look if they turned such an offer down?
That's a fair point about states usurping local authority, but on the contrary, you can bet Amazon would have significant leverage over any state in which it chooses to locate.
For example, I think that both the Texas and Georgia legislatures would be changing their socially conservative tune pretty quickly if Amazon made an offer to locate in either Austin/Dallas or Atlanta, respectively, contingent upon passage of state-level LGBT protections. Can you imagine how ridiculous any state would look if they turned such an offer down?
I actually think that would backfire, people really don't like being told what to do and it's not like they need the jobs.
It would be 100% seen as a stand for democracy against corporate Interests
Calling a state a “red state” or “blue state” is a simple term to describe what can be pretty complex which is a state and their politics. Politics matter when it comes to business especially in the Trump era, it’s easy to dismiss it but it’s actially pretty consequential and matters when large corporations are looking at where to relocate.
Agreed and in this case, Amazon will need to really look at the balance of business friendly climates with the backdrop of progressive social legislation. Will Amazon go for many millions of dollars in business benefits to put itself in a less socially progressive state? Will they prefer to loose financial benefit to locate to a state with more liberal policies and laws? What is the break even point of business gain against social issues?
I'm sure Amazon has a weighting formula for determining this, as well as ever other factor in their criteria, and it no doubt will be part of their consideration in selection.
As you have stated ad nauseam. This is nothing more more than the wishful thinking of a Chicago homer.
And the desperately unhappy and bitter "Anti-Atlanta" Troll-O-Rama that we put up with here on a daily basis.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.