U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 1 million other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads.

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 

Closed Thread


 
Unread 04-23-2008, 04:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arlington, VA
593 posts, read 1,081,423 times
Reputation: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
Boston is a cosmopolitan city! Hands down, it feels bigger than Atlanta. The same can said for San Francisco. It's smaller than all of the Sun Belt cities but it feels much larger because of its urban fabric. Atlanta is too car dependant.
I am a former Bostonian myself, and I would agree with this. Atlanta is much more of a "car city." Boston also 'feels' larger because the urban landscape stretches farther out from the downtown area than in Atlanta. Boston is a great city but it is far too expensive for young people to live there!
Quick reply to this message

 
Unread 04-23-2008, 04:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
104 posts, read 166,256 times
Reputation: 49
Does the wideness of Atlanta's highways and streets give some the feeling of the largness of Atlanta. Does street width, grid and patterns, topography affect the way in which one determines how big a place "feels"? What about the amount of traffic and highway lanes?

Last edited by brri; 04-23-2008 at 05:07 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 04:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta
1,968 posts, read 1,955,439 times
Reputation: 806
Ok, how about a little visual aid. These are pictures of Atlanta from the air and ground at different distances from the city center. Maybe they can help give an idea of the size of Atlanta.

If someone could post similar pics of Boston we would have a comparison. Maybe I'll post some myself if I can find any.

Downtown (the center)




At street level







Midtown (2 miles north of center)









Buckhead (8 miles north of center)











Sandy Springs (11 miles North of Center)




Cumberland (13 miles N.E. of Center)

Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,187 posts, read 1,863,149 times
Reputation: 338
Here is Buckhead: This isn't even the main skyline. Does Boston have something comparable?


Here's another of Buckhead:
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,187 posts, read 1,863,149 times
Reputation: 338
Even when shown pictures of the expansiveness of Atlanta, people still want to live in the past like it's 1955, when southern cities were much smaller.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
Okay, I'll bite.

Downtown Boston:




Back Bay (2 mile southwest of Center)




Cambridge (2.5 miles northwest of center)





ah it's way harder to find pictures than I thought. I just wasted a looot of time and those don't even make Boston look large.
whatever.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
but those pictures of Atlanta (especially "Cumberland" and "Sandy Springs") really don't make the city look big, they just make it seem like you have a lot of skyscrapers. Is that the judge of how large a city feels?
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:21 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
2,898 posts, read 2,557,646 times
Reputation: 895
To answer the question of one of the posters. You can drive 21 miles continuously thru Chicago (north to south). I think Chicago has some of the longest continuous streets in the US. As for Atlanta, those pics are great and it does give you a better perspective on the scope. On the outside Atlanta does look bigger but when you are smack dab in the center of it all, pound for pound, Boston just feels bigger because of the density, street scene and cosmopolitan nature. Atlanta loses major points because it does not sit on a grid. Some of the pics look like the suburbs.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest View Post
Atlanta loses major points because it does not sit on a grid.
Neither does Boston. Or the surrounding towns. It's one of my favourite things about it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
2,898 posts, read 2,557,646 times
Reputation: 895
I agree! Boston doesn't sit on a grid like Chicago but the streets are more conducive to an urban environment.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



Closed Thread


Quick Reply
Message:

Similar Threads


Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM.

© 2005-2012, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 - Top