|

04-23-2008, 04:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Arlington, VA
593 posts, read 1,081,423 times
Reputation: 255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest
Boston is a cosmopolitan city! Hands down, it feels bigger than Atlanta. The same can said for San Francisco. It's smaller than all of the Sun Belt cities but it feels much larger because of its urban fabric. Atlanta is too car dependant.
|
I am a former Bostonian myself, and I would agree with this. Atlanta is much more of a "car city." Boston also 'feels' larger because the urban landscape stretches farther out from the downtown area than in Atlanta. Boston is a great city but it is far too expensive for young people to live there!
|
|

04-23-2008, 04:36 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
104 posts, read 166,256 times
Reputation: 49
|
|
|
Does the wideness of Atlanta's highways and streets give some the feeling of the largness of Atlanta. Does street width, grid and patterns, topography affect the way in which one determines how big a place "feels"? What about the amount of traffic and highway lanes?
Last edited by brri; 04-23-2008 at 05:07 PM..
|
|

04-23-2008, 04:38 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Atlanta
1,968 posts, read 1,955,439 times
Reputation: 806
|
|
|
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,187 posts, read 1,863,149 times
Reputation: 338
|
|
Here is Buckhead: This isn't even the main skyline. Does Boston have something comparable?
Here's another of Buckhead:

|
|

04-23-2008, 05:03 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
1,187 posts, read 1,863,149 times
Reputation: 338
|
|
|
Even when shown pictures of the expansiveness of Atlanta, people still want to live in the past like it's 1955, when southern cities were much smaller.
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
|
|
|
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
|
|
|
but those pictures of Atlanta (especially "Cumberland" and "Sandy Springs") really don't make the city look big, they just make it seem like you have a lot of skyscrapers. Is that the judge of how large a city feels?
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
2,898 posts, read 2,557,646 times
Reputation: 895
|
|
|
To answer the question of one of the posters. You can drive 21 miles continuously thru Chicago (north to south). I think Chicago has some of the longest continuous streets in the US. As for Atlanta, those pics are great and it does give you a better perspective on the scope. On the outside Atlanta does look bigger but when you are smack dab in the center of it all, pound for pound, Boston just feels bigger because of the density, street scene and cosmopolitan nature. Atlanta loses major points because it does not sit on a grid. Some of the pics look like the suburbs.
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New England & The Maritimes
2,137 posts, read 2,222,895 times
Reputation: 1114
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC's Finest
Atlanta loses major points because it does not sit on a grid.
|
Neither does Boston. Or the surrounding towns. It's one of my favourite things about it.
|
|

04-23-2008, 05:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
2,898 posts, read 2,557,646 times
Reputation: 895
|
|
|
I agree! Boston doesn't sit on a grid like Chicago but the streets are more conducive to an urban environment.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|