|

07-03-2008, 12:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
798 posts, read 558,822 times
Reputation: 155
|
|
Food & Wine- 2 US cities are among the world's top dining destinations
Food & Wine has recently selected the 10 best restaurant cities in the world and two US cities (New York & Chicago) made the cut. In my opinion, San Francisco should be right there along with NYC & CHI.
Which is the most exciting restaurant city in the world right now? Hint: It’s not Paris, and it’s not New York.... It’s Tokyo, hands-down, thanks to the city’s ultra-diverse, thrillingly dynamic food scene.
1. Tokyo
2. Paris
3. New York City
4. London
5. Barcelona
6. Sydney
7. Madrid
8. Chicago
9. Stockholm
10. Vancouver, Canada
10 Best Restaurant Cities | Food & Wine
|
|

07-03-2008, 12:49 PM
|
|
Omaha: Excitement Building on the Plains
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: west Omaha
408 posts, read 633,708 times
Reputation: 152
|
|
|
Vancouver should be commended for being listed among this 'who's who' of the world's cities (which I guess you'd expect to feature the finest dining... by virtue of numbers alone).
My only question is... where is Omaha ???
(no please... don't answer that... I'm trying to lighten things up a little!)
|
|

07-03-2008, 01:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Decatur and St Simons Island, GA
6,190 posts, read 4,076,491 times
Reputation: 1629
|
|
|
Wow, no Italian cities? Some of the best food experiences I ever had were in Florence, Venice and Rome.
|
|

07-03-2008, 01:10 PM
|
|
Rangers FC supporter
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Chicagoland
17,322 posts, read 19,195,403 times
Reputation: 4913
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LovinDecatur
Wow, no Italian cities? Some of the best food experiences I ever had were in Florence, Venice and Rome.
|
Its probably because they focus on too much of one thing, in Italy's case: pasta. Same could be said for Mexico City and tacos, etc. While Italy does pasta best, and Mexico City might do burritos best, you cant walk into Tuscany and find a Thai restaurant, ya know? Its quality and quantity in this case, and places like NYC, Chicago, etc, dont have one set cuisine that eveyrthing revolves around. You can get Ehtiopian, Thai, Mexican, American, Brazilian, etc, etc, and those restaurants are well represented and the food is prepared/cooked by some of the best in the industry. See where Im coming from?
|
|

07-03-2008, 01:17 PM
|
|
Chance favors the prepared mind.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
6,366 posts, read 6,765,648 times
Reputation: 2420
|
|
|
I can't believe places like Stockholm and Madrid are ahead of places like Montreal, San Francisco, or Hong Kong.
|
|

07-03-2008, 01:39 PM
|
|
Reason shall prevail
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
1,146 posts, read 1,340,807 times
Reputation: 342
|
|
Have you been to Stockholm? It has a lot of fine dining. In my experience the likelihood of eating well in a random restaurant is much higher in Stockholm than London. Food in England is generally terrible. It really depends how much you need to pay for the fine dining. You have to pay a lot in London to get some decent food. In Barcelona the portions are so small so it ends up being rather expensive. Portions in the U.S tend to be more generous than most of Europe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT
I can't believe places like Stockholm and Madrid are ahead of places like Montreal, San Francisco, or Hong Kong.
|
Last edited by internat; 07-03-2008 at 01:47 PM..
|
|

07-03-2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Chance favors the prepared mind.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
6,366 posts, read 6,765,648 times
Reputation: 2420
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by internat
Have you been to Stockholm? It has a lot of fine dining. In my experience the likelihood of eating well in a random restaurant is much higher in Stockholm than London. Food in England is generally terrible. It really depends how much you need to pay for the fine dining. You have to pay a lot in London to get some decent food. In Barcelona the portions are so small so it ends up being rather expensive. Portions in the U.S tend to be more generous than most of Europe.
|
Yes, I've been to Stockholm. It's a beautiful, exceptionally clean city where people speak better English than many Americans. In my experience, there's a much richer variety of excellent food in places like Montreal, San Francisco, and Hong Kong. I mean geez, even mall food courts in Montreal have fantastic food.
I agree that it's more difficult to find good food in London, and invariably it's at an ethnic restaurant (of which there are plenty, thank goodness). I don't know if there's such a thing as "fine English food" haha.
Having said that, there is good food to be found anywhere. I have had excellent food in Stockholm to be sure.
But since this is the US forum, we should probably concentrate on American cities. So here's my list of places in America with the best food based on cost (availability to the masses and not just a few wealthy elite), quality, and variety. I don't drink, so wine isn't a consideration:
1. New York
2. San Francisco
3. Chicago
4. New Orleans
5. Miami
6. Boston
7. Honolulu
8. Atlanta
9. Houston
10. Detroit
|
|

07-03-2008, 02:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago "Boogie Down Uptown"
1,078 posts, read 706,171 times
Reputation: 359
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT
Yes, I've been to Stockholm. It's a beautiful, exceptionally clean city where people speak better English than many Americans. In my experience, there's a much richer variety of excellent food in places like Montreal, San Francisco, and Hong Kong. I mean geez, even mall food courts in Montreal have fantastic food.
I agree that it's more difficult to find good food in London, and invariably it's at an ethnic restaurant (of which there are plenty, thank goodness). I don't know if there's such a thing as "fine English food" haha.
Having said that, there is good food to be found anywhere. I have had excellent food in Stockholm to be sure.
But since this is the US forum, we should probably concentrate on American cities. So here's my list of places in America with the best food based on cost (availability to the masses and not just a few wealthy elite), quality, and variety. I don't drink, so wine isn't a consideration:
1. New York
2. San Francisco
3. Chicago
4. New Orleans
5. Miami
6. Boston
7. Honolulu
8. Atlanta
9. Houston
10. Detroit
|
I'm no food expert...but chances are you aren't either. Should the only 2 cities that made it on Food & Wine's list also be listed as the #1 and #2 cities on the list?
|
|

07-03-2008, 03:04 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
1,757 posts, read 1,501,371 times
Reputation: 462
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMT
I can't believe places like Stockholm and Madrid are ahead of places like Montreal, San Francisco, or Hong Kong.
|
I loved Madrid during my visit there, but the food there left a lot to be desired IMO. I found myself eating at the American style cafes quite a bit.
|
|

07-03-2008, 03:11 PM
|
|
Chance favors the prepared mind.
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
6,366 posts, read 6,765,648 times
Reputation: 2420
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gtownoe
I'm no food expert...but chances are you aren't either. Should the only 2 cities that made it on Food & Wine's list also be listed as the #1 and #2 cities on the list?
|
I never said that my criteria were the same as Food & Wine's criteria.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|