Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oslo - hills and stuff. nice one!
Stockholm - like Oslo, but bigger
Copenhagen - Modern, cool etc... but it should be a lot bigger!
London - Very nice system! Lots of people all the time
Paris - Nice one! Rubberwheels makes more noice than it should ;p
Berlin - Nice one, but noizy
Hamburg - Ok system
Washington DC - Washington - This is a gorgeous metro. great stations, and a quite extensive network.
Nicest one in USA
New York - Dirty, stinky .. worst subway system ever tried! but very effective in coverage and a true 24/7
Toronto - Meh. Perfectly fine, though nothing special; it went to the places I needed to get to, mostly, was relatively quick, and was functional rather than aesthetic
London
Glasgow
Paris
Frankfurt
Munich
Barcelona
Singapore
Hong Kong
Tokyo
Osaka
Sydney
Washington DC
New York
Boston
Chicago
San Francisco
Toronto
Montreal
My favourite? After London (of course) it would have to be Tokyo because of all the great tunes they play before the doors close!
NYC
Washington DC
Philly
Seattle
San Francisco
London
Amsterdam
I thought Amsterdam had the friendliest
I think coverage was great in NYC, DC & London
I didn't even know Seattle's existed beyond the mono-rail, but a client took me on to get down to a baseball game and it was free given the time of day & distance ........ i knew the buses ran like that, but didn't even know there was a little underground train/trolly in existence
philly is OK - not the cleanest, not that much coverage (although supplemented with the regional rails)
Chicago - I ride it every day. Good coverage and frequency, but rails are undermaintained and decrepit, leading to frustrating slow zones all over the system.
New York - confusing as hell to the outsider (especially transfers), but you gotta love the coverage
Buenos Aires - dirt cheap (about 30 cents a ride), but no air conditioning (cars actually have windows that open/close)
DC - clean and modern
Boston - nice enough
Cleveland - glorified commuter rail, but nice
Montreal - unlike most, I found it to be dirty
Stockholm - very clean and pleasant
Sydney - again, very clean and pleasant
Rome - nice enough, but coverage isn't very good
London - good, but so crowded
Paris - great coverage, modern
San Francisco - spanking new the only time I rode it sometime in the 70's
washington-great, clean, new, extensive system
baltimore-limited, average
new york-hot inside station, but very extensive and cheap
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But my favorite is probably the Metro.
.
