Is the Western US transitioning into being forestless? (house, live)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Where I live, whenever there is a fire only about half of the trees actually burn and die and the next year seedlings sprout right away. I think the U.S. has more forest now that it did 100 years ago.
Of coarse there is some global warming, that's what happens when we are coming out of an ice age !
Don't worry, tomorrow will be there for you !
The fires are perfectly normal. The reason wildfires burn out of control now is because natural fires have been put out for so long allowing excessive buildup, it's the same way here in the southeastern pine forests. "Smokey Bear" wasn't such a good thing for America's forests. I do worry about introduced diseases and insects though, whether it be Sudden Oak Death in California or the Emerald Ash Borer in the midwest.
I know exactly why the OP is worrying so much. If anyone takes a drive through the Rockies, it's impossible not to worry. Huge swaths of forest are brown from those stupid pine beetles. My friend has a house in a remote mountain range in southern Wyoming. The entire mountain behind him is now dead thanks to the beetle. They are holding their breath, because at any second the whole mountain could take flame. But I read that last winter killed a lot of the beetles off, and we're supposed to have another harsh winter, so hopefully that will keep their numbers down.
The pine beetles are very hazardous but I don't worry about fires. Fires are a natural way for trees to reproduce. When a fire kills a tree it plants about 5X as many seeds in its place.
Furthering my Point that The entire West is just Dry ugly Desert and Never any lush Green out here.... it's how it's always been out here... The so called forests i guess if they want to call it forests... there just ugly Pine trees...in the West that's just it...... All the west has are coniferous Trees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't think with the exception of the Immediate Pacific coastal Areas and Pacific Northwest... i don't think there is one naturally Grown Deciduous Tree in the ENTIRE WESTERN REGION!!!!!!!!
THIS IS WHY I CAN'T STAND THE WEST COAST!!!!!!! all the trees on the EAST COAST are mostly Deciduous Tree Forests!!!!!!
WAY MORE BEAUTIFUL SCENIC SCENERY ON THE EAST COAST!!!!!
Furthering my Point that The entire West is just Dry ugly Desert and Never any lush Green out here.... it's how it's always been out here... The so called forests i guess if they want to call it forests... there just ugly Pine trees...in the West that's just it...... All the west has are coniferous Trees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I don't think with the exception of the Immediate Pacific coastal Areas and Pacific Northwest... i don't think there is one naturally Grown Deciduous Tree in the ENTIRE WESTERN REGION!!!!!!!!
THIS IS WHY I CAN'T STAND THE WEST COAST!!!!!!! all the trees on the EAST COAST are mostly Deciduous Tree Forests!!!!!!
WAY MORE BEAUTIFUL SCENIC SCENERY ON THE EAST COAST!!!!!
Leave then. But actually, in Southern Oregon the forests are naturally more deciduous than coniferous, with oaks, madrones, and manzanita, among other species.
I don't think we have to worry too much about deforestation from natural causes so much as from human causes. Especially in places like Brazil.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.