Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Considering all the drugs that alot of celebrities are on, I would not exactly be bragging about what celebrities are present in a given city. I would consider it to be a negative as would most people save for those who live vicariously through the supermarket tabloids
You say La is to Sprawled when you forgot about your city Houston. Here's the Facts sir,
Houstons
Area - City 601.7 sq mi (1,558 km²) - Land 579.4 sq mi (1,501 km²) - Water 22.3 sq mi (57.7 km²)
Los Angeles
- City 498.3 sq mi (1,290.6 km²) - Land 469.1 sq mi (1,214.9 km²) - Water 29.2 sq mi (75.7 km²) 5.8% - Urban 1,667.9 sq mi (4,319.9 km²)
So you tell me whats more Sprawled. Don't say more than you Can say without Proving it.You say La is to spread out when Houston is more spread out than L.A.I Proved it wheres your back up.
Last edited by californialove24; 10-12-2008 at 02:24 PM..
You say La is to Sprawled when you forgot about your city Houston. Here's the Facts sir,
Houstons
Area - City 601.7 sq mi (1,558 km²) - Land 579.4 sq mi (1,501 km²) - Water 22.3 sq mi (57.7 km²)
Los Angeles
- City 498.3 sq mi (1,290.6 km²) - Land 469.1 sq mi (1,214.9 km²) - Water 29.2 sq mi (75.7 km²) 5.8% - Urban 1,667.9 sq mi (4,319.9 km²)
So you tell me whats more Sprawled. Don't say more than you Can say without Proving it.You say La is to spread out when Houston is more spread out than L.A.I Proved it wheres your back up.
I think you need reading comprehension lessons! There is nothing in my post about sprawl. If you are going to quote me, at least use a quote that I made which applies to your "response"
You say La is to Sprawled when you forgot about your city Houston. Here's the Facts sir,
Houstons
Area - City 601.7 sq mi (1,558 km²) - Land 579.4 sq mi (1,501 km²) - Water 22.3 sq mi (57.7 km²)
Los Angeles
- City 498.3 sq mi (1,290.6 km²) - Land 469.1 sq mi (1,214.9 km²) - Water 29.2 sq mi (75.7 km²) 5.8% - Urban 1,667.9 sq mi (4,319.9 km²)
So you tell me whats more Sprawled. Don't say more than you Can say without Proving it.You say La is to spread out when Houston is more spread out than L.A.I Proved it wheres your back up.
Next time also exclude the majority of the East End and the flood plains.
I think you need reading comprehension lessons! There is nothing in my post about sprawl. If you are going to quote me, at least use a quote that I made which applies to your "response"
In Other forums I Read from your post about L.A. being to Sprawled Sir,Sweetclimber.
Next time also exclude the majority of the East End and the flood plains.
i Have no Idea what your talking about Sir.But whatever it is Its still apart of Houston.Parts of L.A. Have miles of Mountains and they still count mountains apart of L.A.'s Land Area.
i Have no Idea what your talking about Sir.But whatever it is Its still apart of Houston.Parts of L.A. Have miles of Mountains and they still count mountains apart of L.A.'s Land Area.
In that 601 sq mi your including lots of undeveloped land,flood plains, and oil fields.
Nice Try. But theres no war. Go fetch some more Links.
Hey i have more links but im not going to waist my time to put up things from the pages and making a link for each of those words. I actually have a live.
Hey i have more links but im not going to waist my time to put up things from the pages and making a link for each of those words. I actually have a live.
Wheres the War. Post as much as you want Theres no war. I Could put the Whole wikipedia if i wanted to but that would be to many Links.
I dont know maybe you should actually look at the links before saying anything because i read the whole LA page and i am not impressed. All that stuff you posted looked persuasive but isnt. If i posted all the companies and stuff in NYC it would take effort but on that page it already had it laid out which usually means thats it. Also it wont be as many links as NYC. Have you looked at both pages. The NYC page is way larger than the LA page. I didnt even post links from the page. These are all separate pages. ANd your post before the last post about the metro area is just sad, how you needed to bring outer areas apart of this. You are right this isnt a battle because LA couldn't win. I see La more as somewhere i would vacation not live. And you brought sports into this when records are beaten every year.
Last edited by CityPolice; 10-13-2008 at 02:39 AM..
new york, while not the greatest city in the world, is the greatest city in America. However, it can't compare to Los Angeles and shouldn't try if it wanted to. Too many variables that are completely different. You may want to try and compare the two in size or economic output, but that would be the end of it right there. Also, not a good move to list or consider wikipedia to be an accurate source. Architecture is one thing, but to list the cultural amenities associated with European origin is not effective. Just shows the lack of homegrown diversity, and new york is a slave to European culture. Los Angeles, not. Still, as impressive as the list looks, why did new york fail this country again and why does L. A. remain more influential around the world? Why do we keep bailing this hole out? Let 'em die on the vine
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But theres no war. Go fetch some more Links.
Yeah
