Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Call me old-fashioned, but it doesn't work like that. You don't choose women by catalogue.
Although related I have a feeling we're entering into a discussion about relationships rather than top cities to meet single women. I understand what you're saying. I don't disagree.
With all do respect, it's difficult to explain taste in women in a few sentences to strangers on an anonymous message board. I'm quite old-fashioned too. I don't think one can choose women like in the 1980's movie "Weird Science".
High quality single women is only one of many things I consider. I know you meet women by chance (or women like to think so, in reality you should put yourself in situations where you can meet them), and sure, it's very difficult to know in advance before you get to know someone well. The friendship and intimacy of a partner is a basic human need - I therefore think it's very important. You can of course turn it around and say if you're outgoing enough it's possible to meet women almost wherever and whenever.
The positives for NYC is the women are often career oriented so they remain single till a bit later in life. I noticed in the south many women are married and have kids by the latest 25. The ones that are single I wouldnt touch with a stolen d*ck.
The positives for NYC is the women are often career oriented so they remain single till a bit later in life. I noticed in the south many women are married and have kids by the latest 25. The ones that are single I wouldnt touch with a stolen d*ck.
You must not have been to any of the large Southern cities then. The best cities for singles are Atlanta, any large Texas city, Denver, LA, DC area and Raleigh.
If these Southern women are so nasty as you put it, why is it that Southern women are widely regarded as the best looking in the country (along with California)? Maybe because they don't sound like they have nasal congestion like NYC women sound when they talk???
You must not have been to any of the large Southern cities then. The best cities for singles are Atlanta, any large Texas city, Denver, LA, DC area and Raleigh.
If these Southern women are so nasty as you put it, why is it that Southern women are widely regarded as the best looking in the country (along with California)? Maybe because they don't sound like they have nasal congestion like NYC women sound when they talk???
I would rank NY above or at least equal to any of those cities as I have been to DC, Raliegh, and Houston out of the ones you listed.
Many women in NYC esp from Manhattan have migrated from other states/countries so whatever nasal congestion your talking about is not prevalent.
Southern and Midwest ladies are the best. They're good-looking (Southern more so), and seem to be marriage-minded. Forget the west-coast chicks.. dated plenty living in SoCal and Hawaii. I also do not like Toronto chicks.. they're too into guys with riced-out cars and shopping at Yorkdale mall and they live with their parents until they're 30. I like women that are still interested in the white-picket fence house. And no I'm not old-fashioned, I don't like mousey-docile women who have no education and say "yes" to everything they're told to do. But I'm not looking for anyone, I'm already married to Mrs. Right.
I have lived in toronto for almost 20 years and they are some of the most stuck up chicks because of the city lifestyle
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.