|
04-29-2009, 07:37 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
714 posts, read 433,968 times
Reputation: 216
|
|
PNW Map - updated
here is a map showing the narrowest and widest PNW definitions.
|
|
05-01-2009, 02:39 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
714 posts, read 433,968 times
Reputation: 216
|
|
|
any comments?
|
|
05-01-2009, 03:15 PM
|
|
408
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sannozay
3,374 posts, read 2,719,790 times
Reputation: 969
|
|
|
It should stop around the Mendocino County border with Sonoma.
|
|
05-01-2009, 03:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Island of San Francisco
1,072 posts, read 563,941 times
Reputation: 272
|
|
|
Old one was more accurate imo.
|
|
05-01-2009, 05:19 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Greater PDX
894 posts, read 643,123 times
Reputation: 545
|
|
|
Wyoming? Alberta? It's debatable whether Idaho is even Pac NW.
I'd say it's Alaska, BC, WA, and OR. Far north Cali may fit in geography wise but I don't think anyone considers them northwesterners.
|
|
05-01-2009, 06:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: British Columbia.
343 posts, read 174,592 times
Reputation: 193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Shaft
Wyoming? Alberta? It's debatable whether Idaho is even Pac NW.
I'd say it's Alaska, BC, WA, and OR. Far north Cali may fit in geography wise but I don't think anyone considers them northwesterners.
|
That map is good, except it goes to deep into California. |
|
05-01-2009, 06:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
761 posts, read 427,229 times
Reputation: 230
|
|
|
You were going for broad. The SF Bay Area and California's Central Coast DO NOT belong as part of the PNW. Other than that, it seems fine.
|
|
05-01-2009, 06:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
1,922 posts, read 899,425 times
Reputation: 570
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdy1985
You were going for broad. The SF Bay Area and California's Central Coast DO NOT belong as part of the PNW. Other than that, it seems fine.
|
Why don't you consider the Bay Area PNW? |
|
05-01-2009, 07:05 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: los angeles
5,033 posts, read 2,761,117 times
Reputation: 1068
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Summers
Why don't you consider the Bay Area PNW?
|
The better question should be: would you place Oregon & Washington in California region? There really isn't anything in common with the Bay Area & the PacificNW but the northern California coastline down to Mendocino county could be considered PNW in my opinion. |
|
05-01-2009, 08:18 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: British Columbia.
343 posts, read 174,592 times
Reputation: 193
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Summers
Why don't you consider the Bay Area PNW?
|
The pacific northwest at the most extends down towards Redding or Eureka. From what I understand the southern most portion of the Cascades are just north of there.
The best map of the PNW follows the inside passage from the southern tip in Puget Sound all the way up Prince William Sound and Juneau Alaska.
 |
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|
Welcome to City-Data.com forum! Make sure to register - it's free and very quick! You have to register before you can post and participate in our discussions with 700,000 other registered members. User profiles and some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your free account you will be able to customize many options, you will have the full access to over 15,000 posts/day about local topics and you will see fewer ads. 
Linear Mode
