Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2009, 09:37 AM
 
Location: Sarasota, Florida
15,395 posts, read 22,515,219 times
Reputation: 11134

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeSoHood View Post
I have a feeling that many midwestern/eastern cities are sitting on a gold mine with the fresh water. Undoubtedly in the future, these areas will see changes due to the water needs.

What do you guys think? I believe fresh water is becoming a huge resource crisis.
I agree with you...The West and Sunbelt in general will soon face severe water shortages...especially Texas as the huge acquifer is drained dry and then what????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2009, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Lower East Side, Milwaukee, WI
2,943 posts, read 5,070,604 times
Reputation: 1113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badger View Post
where were you when they decided to ship it outside of the water table to Waukesha county?

I'm glad Kentucky and West Virginia have decided to keep shipping us thier coal.
Great Lakes compact hits rough waters - JSOnline

"Gunderson's district covers areas of Waukesha County, which has become famous in the debate over who should be allowed access to the Great Lakes because it is so close to the shores of Lake Michigan but just outside the basin. Many of its residents are in dire need of a fresh source of water because the wells they have historically relied upon are contaminated with radium, a naturally occurring but potentially cancer-causing substance."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,794 posts, read 40,990,020 times
Reputation: 62169
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeSoHood View Post
I have a feeling that many midwestern/eastern cities are sitting on a gold mine with the fresh water. Undoubtedly in the future, these areas will see changes due to the water needs.

What do you guys think? I believe fresh water is becoming a huge resource crisis.
I would say, "Soooooooooo, you want to buy some flyover water? Kiss my astroturf patootey!" But, of course, this government will come and nationalize your water, tax your water, tell you when you can drink it and probably outlaw holy water. Then that Sunstein guy in the Obama administration will demand lawyers to represent the fish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Its incredibly naive to think that the sunbelt is going to stop growing simply because there's no water. LOL

It will grow as long as other places sell them water--and everyone has a price.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:17 PM
 
Location: roaming gnome
12,384 posts, read 28,496,781 times
Reputation: 5879
it won't... picturing kingdom of saudi arabia? :I
having water isn't going to reverse population migration trends. I wouldn't get too caught up in any wishful thinking..
now if more cities trend toward offering high tech and service jobs (chicago has been good at this transition)...perhaps. might be too late even for that though , other areas have already done a better job at positioning themselves for this.
I also do not think weather patterns will change any time soon. Most people see the region as unfavorable in context of u.s., that is just how it is. I know many people who have roots and hold loyalty to the region, but that doesn't mean they are moving back in droves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by grapico View Post
it won't... picturing kingdom of saudi arabia? :I
Speaking of Saudi Arabia...Imagine how rich the region could become by selling water to the highest bidder?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:32 PM
 
Location: NJ
12,283 posts, read 35,677,666 times
Reputation: 5331
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
I would say, "Soooooooooo, you want to buy some flyover water? Kiss my astroturf patootey!" But, of course, this government will come and nationalize your water, tax your water, tell you when you can drink it and probably outlaw holy water. Then that Sunstein guy in the Obama administration will demand lawyers to represent the fish.
omg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:44 PM
 
Location: LaSalle Park / St. Louis
572 posts, read 1,994,747 times
Reputation: 268
I think the regions with less water will find new ways to get it.
They will charge more for it.
The more the areas grow, the more water will cost.
And...as water get too expensive, people may start moving back to where it is plentiful.
But...this is a long way off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 01:55 PM
 
8 posts, read 12,075 times
Reputation: 15
i love how midwesterners from chic get all provincial when talking about water...like its their divine right to have fresh water. its all for the American people...quit being all greedy and trying to place importance on your boring midwestern location. what if cali said "no fanny pack midwesterners within 5 miles of CA state beaches"?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2009, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Albuquerque
159 posts, read 511,233 times
Reputation: 185
I'm from Albuquerque, not as "deserty" as Phoenix, but still a desert nonetheless. I think it would be pretty dumb to build pipes thousands of miles to bring water to Arizona. Everyone who lives in the desert is basically saying "I'm aware that i live in a water sensitive area, and that waters a precious resource". But don't think we're all water starved zombies wasting all our water Albuquerque alone used 749 million gallons less than what the goal was.

And i can't believe some people are saying "I can't wait for them to run out of water so the midwest can boom again". Why would you want people to suffer just so you can see your region boom again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top