U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Business Search - 14 Million verified businesses
Search for:  near: 
 
 
Old 10-09-2009, 11:03 PM
 
5,199 posts, read 8,714,913 times
Reputation: 3532
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachael84 View Post
We have them here in NY.
That's very interesting.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-10-2009, 05:09 AM
 
517 posts, read 749,761 times
Reputation: 190
You have to have them in California. I actually got a ticket for not having one. At the time my car was parked in my high school parking lot so I guess some lame cop had enough time on his hands to walk by all 1,000 cars (my high school had 4,000 students so I am not exaggerating about the amount of cars) in our parking lot. I got out of class to see the ticket on my windshield. I believe it was a $25.00 ticket...I could be wrong though.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 11:04 AM
 
Location: Dayton, OH/Portland, OR
398 posts, read 810,064 times
Reputation: 199
I personally think front and back plates are a good idea. Witnesses can identify cars involved in crimes from both angles and from rearview mirrors. And then there is the whole red-light camera thing. Whether you agree with it or not, in the places where it is legal it would make sense to have cars with front plates.

When I lived in Oregon, they had front and rear plates with tags on both front and rear. So two sets of tags. I don't know if it is still like that or not. Where I live now, in Ohio, they have front and rear plates but the tags only go on the rear plates. I guess that is a good comprimise if you are looking at it from a cost point of view?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 11:25 AM
 
6,046 posts, read 6,063,806 times
Reputation: 2203
I find front plates unnecessary. A good part about only having plates in the back is that you can put a plate you like up front (example: my college has special license plates you can put on the front if your state doesn't require front plates).
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 11:39 AM
 
5,973 posts, read 3,414,517 times
Reputation: 1614
I think front and back plates are very important to help law enforcement identify an automobile. I think all states should require them.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:17 PM
 
2,445 posts, read 2,428,855 times
Reputation: 3115
Quote:
Originally Posted by 540_804 View Post
Yep...

But i've always wondered, what do you do about a car that doesn't come with a front license plate holder?

For example, a guy that goes to my school has an Aston Martin and it doesn't have any place to attach the front tags so he doesn't have any. Its def. illegal and I'm not sure how many tickets he gets (i'm sure he can afford them..lol) but what do you do in that situation? I'd absolutely hate drilling holes in the front of my car to attach a license plate/tag holder...
Well, seeing as Aston Martins are British made and front plates are compulsory in Britain I'm sure they must have thought about that.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:18 PM
 
2,445 posts, read 2,428,855 times
Reputation: 3115
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogre View Post
That's very interesting.
You're a bad man, ogre.

Last edited by Perfect Stranger; 10-10-2009 at 02:38 PM..
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 05:46 PM
Status: "Happy Halloween!" (set 6 days ago)
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
69,141 posts, read 58,270,444 times
Reputation: 19697
You get two in Colorado, but I think you're only absolutely required to display one. Sorry, I'm too lazy to go look this up right now.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2009, 05:48 PM
 
Location: Coeur d'Alene Idaho
794 posts, read 1,408,922 times
Reputation: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by J'aimeDesVilles View Post
Why do some states still have frontal license plates? Is it really necessary? Seems like doing away with them would be one way the state could save a few bucks. Although I suppose it wouldn't be a significant amount.
Simple.. A good officer can catch a front license plate number on a city road and run your license plate as your drive by if he so wishes. Also if no one had front license plates then all the red light cameras would be useless.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 02:08 AM
 
41,643 posts, read 44,893,785 times
Reputation: 12784
So that the vehicle is easier to spot if used in a offense of course.Many sates abandoned them only for cost to produce.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $84,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2014, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 - Top