Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-19-2010, 06:33 PM
 
Location: New Orleans, United States
4,230 posts, read 10,484,556 times
Reputation: 1444

Advertisements

Interesting numbers. This list is nothing like I thought it would be. Apparently these numbers relate more-so to infrastructure vs. uncontrolled growth and sprawl, since many of the cities considered to be empires of sprawl on C-D are not at the top of the list.

America's 75 Worst Commutes - Page 1 - The Daily Beast
Quote:
Our first step was ranking the metropolitan areas with the worst rush-hour congestion. The order is based on the peak hour Travel Time Index (TTI) for the metropolitan area each highway is in. TTI is a measure of how much longer it takes to complete a road journey during peak congestion hours compared to free-flow hours. (Peak hours are defined as 6 a.m. to 10a.m., and 3 p.m. to 7 p.m.) Speeds during non-peak hours are used by INRIX to establish this free-flow baseline.
After determining the 75 worst metro areas, we then found the worst highway in each, defined as the most hours of bottleneck congestion, as reported by INRIX. The rankings then provide a still deeper look—at the most congested bottleneck segment for the worst highway in each area.
1-30
1. Los Angeles -> Hollywood Freeway
2. Honolulu -> I-H1
3. Washington -> Capital Beltway
4. Austin -> I-35
5. San Francisco -> U.S. 101
6. New York -> Cross-Bronx Expressway
7. Seattle -> I-5
8. Bridgeport -> I-95
9. Chicago -> Kennedy Expressway
10. Miami -> Airport Expressway
11. San Jose -> Bayshore Freeway
12. Houston -> 610 Loop
13. Baton Rouge -> I-10
14. Boston -> Southeast Beltway
15. Fort Worth -> I-820
16. Portland -> I-5
17. Minneapolis -> I-494
18. Virginia Beach -> I-264
19. San Diego -> San Diego Freeway
20. Philadelphia -> Schuylkill Expressway
21. Baltimore -> Beltway
22. Atlanta -> I-75
23. Tampa -> I-275
24. Denver -> I-25
25. Riverside, CA -> Riverside Freeway
26. Oxnard, CA -> Ronald Reagan Freeway
27. New Orleans, LA -> I-10
28. New Haven -> I-91
29. Phoenix -> Papago Freeway
30. Pittsburgh -> Penn Lincoln Parkway
...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2010, 07:35 PM
 
1,712 posts, read 3,102,641 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestbankNOLA View Post
Interesting numbers. This list is nothing like I thought it would be. Apparently these numbers relate more-so to infrastructure vs. uncontrolled growth and sprawl, since many of the cities considered to be empires of sprawl on C-D are not at the top of the list.

America's 75 Worst Commutes - Page 1 - The Daily Beast


1-30
1. Los Angeles -> Hollywood Freeway
2. Honolulu -> I-H1
3. Washington -> Capital Beltway
4. Austin -> I-35
5. San Francisco -> U.S. 101
6. New York -> Cross-Bronx Expressway
7. Seattle -> I-5
8. Bridgeport -> I-95
9. Chicago -> Kennedy Expressway
10. Miami -> Airport Expressway
11. San Jose -> Bayshore Freeway
12. Houston -> 610 Loop
13. Baton Rouge -> I-10
14. Boston -> Southeast Beltway
15. Fort Worth -> I-820
16. Portland -> I-5
17. Minneapolis -> I-494
18. Virginia Beach -> I-264
19. San Diego -> San Diego Freeway
20. Philadelphia -> Schuylkill Expressway
21. Baltimore -> Beltway
22. Atlanta -> I-75
23. Tampa -> I-275
24. Denver -> I-25
25. Riverside, CA -> Riverside Freeway
26. Oxnard, CA -> Ronald Reagan Freeway
27. New Orleans, LA -> I-10
28. New Haven -> I-91
29. Phoenix -> Papago Freeway
30. Pittsburgh -> Penn Lincoln Parkway
...

Interesting...

I guess those public transportation meccas have terrible traffic after all
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 07:43 PM
 
353 posts, read 816,467 times
Reputation: 114
ehhh, Atlanta should be higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 07:49 PM
 
7,845 posts, read 20,805,239 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Native17 View Post
ehhh, Atlanta should be higher.
It doesn't seem to be entire cities that are ranked, but rather the worst commuter routes. Apparently I-75 was deemed the worst commute in Atlanta, and it just didn't rank as highly as about 20 other routes in other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:06 PM
 
Location: East Bay
332 posts, read 772,620 times
Reputation: 286
Cool list, I never knew Honolulu had bad traffic (never had thought about it though). And as the Bay Area goes, I always thought 80 had worse traffic than 101.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:31 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,655 posts, read 67,506,468 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by user376 View Post
And as the Bay Area goes, I always thought 80 had worse traffic than 101.
80 is considerably worse actually.

This ranking is much different from the region's own ranking that is devised by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. In that ranking 80 is first, followed by 580 in the Pleasanton Area and 3rd is 101 in Marin County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:32 PM
 
21,618 posts, read 31,197,189 times
Reputation: 9775
For such a small state, CT makes it on the list twice. And I'm not surprised. Worst traffic in the Northeast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:35 PM
 
412 posts, read 1,152,992 times
Reputation: 198
I'm not surprised about Seattle ranking 7th for worst traffic on I-5. It's always backed up for almost the whole day. It's also the only major North to South freeway running thru the narrow city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 08:39 PM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,456,812 times
Reputation: 4201
Ugh, the Cross-Bronx is the worst drive I've ever been apart of. Whenever I've gone Cross-Bronx, I've sat in place for several hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2010, 09:48 PM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,191,557 times
Reputation: 11355
I see the horrible Chicago traffic on the news each morning. Sometimes those expressway times can get up to an hour and a half just to come 20 miles into the city. I've driven out of the city before where it takes me over 2 hours to go the 45 miles to clear the western suburbs.

Walking to the train, taking the train 8 stops and then walking to work might take 35 minutes - but I do like knowing within 3 or 4 minutes exactly how long it's going to take me to get to work in the morning. I just grab a good book and check out for 20 minutes on the L.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top