|

01-08-2009, 09:25 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,545 posts, read 3,223,473 times
Reputation: 919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deslok
Interesting numbers, where do they come from? The one's I looked at stated California has been growing at about the same rate the past few years, with the larger cities still growing, but not as fast. San Jose is poised to be over a million people, San Fran at about the highest it has ever been.
It depends on what part of California we are comparing the conservative city of GR to. I'd say San Fran is much more diverse, as is LA. I don't think New Port Beach is more diverse per say, but it certainly isn't as conservative as far as fashion, money, and trends are concerned. That does not mean they do not vote for republicans, it means their outlook socially isn't as sheltered.
|
California Population and Components of Change
Far right column is "net domestic migration", meaning: the number of people arriving minus the people leaving. A negative number means there are more people leaving than arriving. They take whatever that number is, add in international immigration, add in births, subtract deaths, and that's how they arrive at the net population gain (or loss). People are fleeing California in droves, heading to Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona and a slew of other destinations. It doesn't matter how diverse or "unsheltered" it is, very few can afford to live there anymore.
|
|

01-09-2009, 05:12 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
316 posts, read 281,187 times
Reputation: 75
|
|
|
The population overall increased year over year. The net migration of 263000 represents a decline, true, but it is less then one percent of the population. It also accounts for the entire state, so comparing Grand Rapids to the entire state of California makes little sense. Besides, you just stated they were allegedly leaving because the cost is so high, not because the state is lacking diversity,which is the impression you gave when we first started this portion of the forum.
|
|

01-10-2009, 10:41 AM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,545 posts, read 3,223,473 times
Reputation: 919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deslok
The population overall increased year over year. The net migration of 263000 represents a decline, true, but it is less then one percent of the population. It also accounts for the entire state, so comparing Grand Rapids to the entire state of California makes little sense. Besides, you just stated they were allegedly leaving because the cost is so high, not because the state is lacking diversity,which is the impression you gave when we first started this portion of the forum.
|
I'm not comparing Grand Rapids to the entire state of California.  You suggested someone move to California. I'm only suggesting that 300,000 more people leaving the state than arriving would probably challenge your suggestion, for whatever reasons. Also, I never suggested California lacked diversity. Some people might be leaving California because of "too much" diversity (racial strife, too much Mexican immigration, etc.).
|
|

01-11-2009, 01:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Grandest Rapids
184 posts, read 188,407 times
Reputation: 70
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan
People are fleeing California in droves, heading to Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Arizona and a slew of other destinations. It doesn't matter how diverse or "unsheltered" it is, very few can afford to live there anymore.
|
Oh absolutely! I recently moved back to MI from southern California BECAUSE it was too expensive. For far less $$, I can afford a better quality of life (in most respects), and have time to enjoy life rather than work work work to make ends meet. Plus no rush hour traffic hell to deal with.
In addition, sure I loved the diversity, but I think the idea of "legal" immigration works better for me than simply sneaking across the border. excuse my saying, but America is not be a landfill for the world's riff-raff. Come here legally, pay taxes and obey the laws and I'll welcome you with open arms.
|
|

01-11-2009, 02:20 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
316 posts, read 281,187 times
Reputation: 75
|
|
|
lol, too many hispanics now means an area has too much diversity?
|
|

01-12-2009, 01:21 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,545 posts, read 3,223,473 times
Reputation: 919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deslok
lol, too many hispanics now means an area has too much diversity?
|
Don't shoot the messenger. Just go read the California section of this forum.
I think it has more to do with illegal immigration, as windfarmer said. Although much of it also might be racial prejudice.
But believe it or not, there are those who seek diversity, and probably just as many who move away from it.
|
|

01-12-2009, 07:54 PM
|
|
Not a member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
316 posts, read 281,187 times
Reputation: 75
|
|
|
Agreed.
|
|

01-13-2009, 10:09 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wallingford, PA
117 posts, read 99,843 times
Reputation: 27
|
|
|
GR is a great place to live for people in the healthcare industry. The average pay for heathcare outpaces most other states in the country, and the cost of living is on the low end for places with good schools.
|
|

01-13-2009, 03:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
380 posts, read 213,980 times
Reputation: 105
|
|
Net migration out of CA is a fraction of the population. You guys should talk percentages vs absolute numbers when comparing diff states. It makes the discussions more meaningful.
Go East, young man? Californians look for the exit - Yahoo! News
|
|

01-13-2009, 11:09 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
4,545 posts, read 3,223,473 times
Reputation: 919
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by actinic
|
Yes, it was about -1% in 2008. But you have to realize that population growth/decline over a one year period is usually measured in fractions of a percent. Fast growing states or metro areas grow by about 1.5 - 2% a year.
Even fast growing states like Arizona have positive net migration of about 1.5% a year. So when it comes to people moving in vs. moving out, California is the exact opposite of states like Arizona.
Births/deaths don't indicate anything regarding an economy. Many 3rd world countries have 3 to 1 or 4 to 1 ratios (or higher). It just means people are having too many babies.
But isn't this thread about Western Michigan people?
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|