U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2010, 10:27 AM
 
6,039 posts, read 9,221,279 times
Reputation: 3933

Advertisements

Would you return to eating meat if all the overtones of animal cruelty were removed from the process of producing meat? If we could grow animal flesh in a nutrient tank (a la sci-fi tech), so that there was never a live animal involved, would you return to eating meat?

This is a question for those of you who don't eat animal products due to moral opinions, not those of you who refuse it on health grounds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-27-2010, 01:04 PM
 
Location: Orlando, Florida
43,858 posts, read 43,597,332 times
Reputation: 58603
I eat meat and wouldn't want to eat any if it came from nutrient tank.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2010, 01:27 PM
 
Location: Visitation between Wal-Mart & Home Depot
8,309 posts, read 33,375,671 times
Reputation: 7038
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryB View Post
I eat meat and wouldn't want to eat any if it came from nutrient tank.
Yeah, I think I'm may just have to go veg if my only option was hydroponic beef.

I'm trying to imagine what texture meat would have without directional muscle fibers, connective tissue, fat cells and blood vessels... Just dry-heaved a little...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2010, 01:32 PM
 
6,039 posts, read 9,221,279 times
Reputation: 3933
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimboburnsy View Post
Yeah, I think I'm may just have to go veg if my only option was hydroponic beef.

I'm trying to imagine what texture meat would have without directional muscle fibers, connective tissue, fat cells and blood vessels... Just dry-heaved a little...
We're already using our imagination simply by the question being asked, so for the sake of argument let's all just pretend it looks, tastes, and feels like meat from a slaughtered critter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2010, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Tujunga
421 posts, read 381,212 times
Reputation: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mercury Cougar View Post
Would you return to eating meat if all the overtones of animal cruelty were removed from the process of producing meat? If we could grow animal flesh in a nutrient tank (a la sci-fi tech), so that there was never a live animal involved, would you return to eating meat?

This is a question for those of you who don't eat animal products due to moral opinions, not those of you who refuse it on health grounds.
If your effectively asking would I eat meat if no animals were killed, hurt or involved in theory then yes.

What your suggesting sounds kind like quorn.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 07:42 AM
 
Location: Cincinnati near
2,509 posts, read 3,358,625 times
Reputation: 5616
My wife is a vegetarian for 'moral' reasons. Her reason does not have anything to do with killing animals per se, but instead it is based on the efficiency of land use. Animals take up a lot more resources to raise than plants, and she feels that eating meat is irresponsible in a world with scarcity caused malnutrition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Visitation between Wal-Mart & Home Depot
8,309 posts, read 33,375,671 times
Reputation: 7038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemistry_Guy View Post
My wife is a vegetarian for 'moral' reasons. Her reason does not have anything to do with killing animals per se, but instead it is based on the efficiency of land use. Animals take up a lot more resources to raise than plants, and she feels that eating meat is irresponsible in a world with scarcity caused malnutrition.
I think that position may be vulnerable to an analysis of how many calories per year can be created per 100 acres on the hoof as opposed to off the stalk. I'm going to have to look into that and I'll get back to you...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 08:05 AM
 
635 posts, read 1,614,337 times
Reputation: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimboburnsy View Post
I'm trying to imagine what texture meat would have without directional muscle fibers, connective tissue, fat cells and blood vessels... Just dry-heaved a little...

AAAACK!!!

I'm what I guess is a flexitarian, left to fish and chicken when I start to fade in the anemic sense of the word. Although red meat would probably be better than the bean/rice combo for a stable protein, sometimes I lapse to fish or chicken to be able to have a little 'boost.' But 85%+ of my meals both at home and at restaurants are veggies only, barring that 15% need to keep from falling face down. And it's entirely brain/images/cruelty driven.

And that disgusting description, which has coursed through my head while eating meat many long years ago, helps me stay clear of meat. Although I do feel these pangs now and then which are almost carnal like I want to run out and chew on a burger. I think that's the low iron count talking though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Visitation between Wal-Mart & Home Depot
8,309 posts, read 33,375,671 times
Reputation: 7038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chemistry_Guy View Post
My wife is a vegetarian for 'moral' reasons. Her reason does not have anything to do with killing animals per se, but instead it is based on the efficiency of land use. Animals take up a lot more resources to raise than plants, and she feels that eating meat is irresponsible in a world with scarcity caused malnutrition.
Impossible to find any meaningful average of course, but assuming 2 acres to graze a cow, 600 lbs. of useable meat from a market ready steer, an average of 1280 calories per pound of meat, 180 bushels of corn per acre and about 7300 btu's per bushel, you can produce roughly three times more calories with with corn on the same acreage.

Not really that meaningful, but I retract my statement under the conditions listed above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2010, 08:16 AM
 
6,039 posts, read 9,221,279 times
Reputation: 3933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattos_12 View Post
What your suggesting sounds kind like quorn.
No, it's not. I'm talking about real meat, not a fake vegetable substitute.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top