Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlaker
Industrial agriculture to the rescue! On Cargill, on Archer! On Daniels and Midland!
|
Your search for a villain to blame everything upon merely serves to demonstrate your predispositions.
Agriculture is still a system that answers to the markets, in which there are hundreds of thousands of sellers, and enough buyers that no single participant has control over prices. Many of those players continued to supplement their (and their spouse's) income in the more-organized sectors of the economy by holding onto the family farm, and growing a "cash crop", working evenings and weekends, once the four-legged element departs, a sideline farm can easily be adjusted to the owners' schedule.
And if large national-market players are able to carve out a bigger niche, it's generally because our oh-sooh-insecure conformistic "consumerist" society is eager to fall into line and unable or unwilling to trust the local producers. The fickle tastes of the "trendy" wannabees have even spawned a huge industry in (supposedly) "organic" groceries which, in turn, have led to a call by the political hacks for additional regulation and (
glory be!) new paychecks for bureaucrats and functionaries.
And finally, let's not overlook the fact that, the fantasies of 22-year-old metrosexuals to the contrary, the typical "organic" food producer has to answer to the market like everyone else -- that means a bigger facility than a little ol' shed with an outhouse out back. The "Annie's Homegrowns" and "Bob's Red Mills" are pretty substantial players. And that doesn't count the brands like Kashi, which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of major corporations, In this case Kellogg, which as it so happens, was founded by a natural food" advocate of an earlier day (Anybody here read or seen
Road to Wellville?) And all of them have to answer to the regulations that favor mass production and squeeze out the marginal operators.