Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-28-2013, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,214 posts, read 11,325,556 times
Reputation: 20827

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlaker View Post
Industrial agriculture to the rescue! On Cargill, on Archer! On Daniels and Midland!
Your search for a villain to blame everything upon merely serves to demonstrate your predispositions.

Agriculture is still a system that answers to the markets, in which there are hundreds of thousands of sellers, and enough buyers that no single participant has control over prices. Many of those players continued to supplement their (and their spouse's) income in the more-organized sectors of the economy by holding onto the family farm, and growing a "cash crop", working evenings and weekends, once the four-legged element departs, a sideline farm can easily be adjusted to the owners' schedule.

And if large national-market players are able to carve out a bigger niche, it's generally because our oh-sooh-insecure conformistic "consumerist" society is eager to fall into line and unable or unwilling to trust the local producers. The fickle tastes of the "trendy" wannabees have even spawned a huge industry in (supposedly) "organic" groceries which, in turn, have led to a call by the political hacks for additional regulation and ( glory be!) new paychecks for bureaucrats and functionaries.

And finally, let's not overlook the fact that, the fantasies of 22-year-old metrosexuals to the contrary, the typical "organic" food producer has to answer to the market like everyone else -- that means a bigger facility than a little ol' shed with an outhouse out back. The "Annie's Homegrowns" and "Bob's Red Mills" are pretty substantial players. And that doesn't count the brands like Kashi, which are wholly-owned subsidiaries of major corporations, In this case Kellogg, which as it so happens, was founded by a natural food" advocate of an earlier day (Anybody here read or seen Road to Wellville?) And all of them have to answer to the regulations that favor mass production and squeeze out the marginal operators.

Last edited by 2nd trick op; 10-28-2013 at 02:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-28-2013, 07:31 PM
 
Location: Waiting for a streetcar
1,137 posts, read 1,390,968 times
Reputation: 1124
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
Your search for a villain to blame everything upon merely serves to demonstrate your predispositions.
As I have posted elsewhere...

Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlaker View Post
The current agriculture is the only known agriculture capable of feeding the current population of the nation and planet. It is impossible for backyard gardens and organic, free-range, smiley-face agriculture to accomplish the task.
----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
Agriculture is still a system that answers to the markets, in which there are hundreds of thousands of sellers, and enough buyers that no single participant has control over prices.
Farm credit, crop insurance, crop subsidies, on and on and on -- the notion that agriculture is some throwback, market-driven enterprise doesn't stack up so well against the facts. Hobby farms can serve a niche if they don't have to suppport anyone, small family farms barely exist at all any more, while large family farms can get by only at the whim and mercy of processor-oligopolies and with help and support from federal programs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op View Post
And finally, let's not overlook the fact that, the fantasies of 22-year-old metrosexuals to the contrary, the typical "organic" food producer has to answer to the market like everyone else -- that means a bigger facility than a little ol' shed with an outhouse out back.
Wouldn't know. Haven't been a 22-year old in more than 40 years and don't hang out with a lot of them. The larger costs and requirements of maintaining "contented cows" and other forms of "old time" agriculture is what renders them incapable of addressing mass markets. We are stuck with the big guys, whether we like them or not. It would be nice if they could do a little more about hog waste ponds and chicken waste runoff, and maybe it isn't a such good idea to have a russett burbank potato monoculture just because McDonald's likes them, but we aren't going to be able to dump the current system. All we can do is try to modify it for the better.

And yes, I know the history behind K-E-double L-O-double Good, thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top