U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 06-30-2013, 06:17 AM
363 posts, read 549,212 times
Reputation: 159


I am sure you are familiar with the law of having to declare $10,000 usd or more whenever you travel with any type of monetary instruments. They claim this is to stop money laundering and terrorism financing. My question is how?

These laws have been in place for a few decades from my understanding, possibly the 1980s. How does someone declaring cash stop terrorist from being financed because bin laden and the rest of the terrorist seem to have no problem transfering money from Saudi Arabia to Pakistan. How is me moving $30,000 from Canada to USA or USA to Cayman Island going to finance terrorist? I am not a terrorist or a money launderer. These anti money laundering laws certainly do not stop

s. Similarly in late 2010, the Wells Fargo-acquired bank, Wachovia, was ordered to pay a $160 million penalty when they failed to detect and investigate the use of their accounts by drug traffickers to launder money into the U.S., including a transfer of $378.4 billion, the equivalent of a third of Mexico’s GDP. Bank of America, it should be noted, is not being charged with any wrongdoing.
FBI: Drug Cartels Use Bank of America to Launder Money

Given that is just ONE bank, it is fair to say that Mexican drug cartels have no real impediment to laundering money and probably launder something like 5-10 trillion a year. So how are these laws allowed when they clearly don't stop terrorist from being financed (because that would require banks to know before hand their customers are terrorist and I severely doubt Osama or most terrorist even use the banking system given that it can be used to track movements) and don't stop money laundering or even impede it.

What is the real purpose of these laws to monitor regular americans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Old 06-30-2013, 06:35 AM
Location: Lower east side of Toronto
10,589 posts, read 10,377,804 times
Reputation: 9273
The core of free and free enterprise is in the ability to have a little extra tucked away. Some cash that is YOURS and that you really do not want to share cos you NEED it. The super rich and I have known one gentlemen in particular who just before he died had billions of dollars and no one bothered him...Why is it if I or you want to have a bag with 10 thousand dollars in it considered a crime? If you have gathered this money through your own efforts and it was done legally...it is no ones business but your own. If the average guy or woman wants to feel secure and have a primitive old fashioned bank roll - why do they have to live in fear for wanting some security that is out side the system?

I have seen incidents were a person will owe a few thousand in taxes...The have 300 dollars to their name..That 300 is sitting in a bank. The person wakes up in the morning to withdraw q few dollars and low and behold..The tax department has emptied their account..and took their last 300 bucks...leaving the person unable to function. How does that help anyone? As for being branded a terrorist because you stuff a wad of cash in the sock drawer....It is oppressive. It seems that some RICH people who hold office and pass laws have this mentality - That..

Only THEY are allowed to have money and YOU are not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 07-06-2013, 04:05 PM
45 posts, read 39,497 times
Reputation: 98
It doesn't really. Certain people just like knowing where money goes and who has it and if they are affiliated with particular groups. Terrorism & cartels are just a pretext to allow the tracking.

It comes down to taxation and the fact that the penultimate use for that money is to grow more money officially thru investments. It is a corporatist scheme to make hoarding on the individual level more difficult so that everyone has a communal stake in maintaining the monopoly game. It's the same reason deposits or debits are traced in levels over $10,000 and must be reported to the IRS, an arm of the Fed.

With fiat currency you must remember the agency that attributes the arbitrary worth to the paper and what they are ultimately up to. Then you will know why these restrictions are in place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top