Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-10-2014, 03:01 PM
 
1,706 posts, read 2,435,571 times
Reputation: 1037

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
It is what it is and the market as always will decide. What you see in Wal Mart is consumer decision on it's success. We have seen many such stories in growth and seen a lot fail in time. Seen to day Wal Mart is shifting CEO and he intends to concentrate more on online marketing.
How can the markets independently decide if the system is skewed and favors big players like WalMart? Are you suggesting that the small business and WalMart are on a level playing field?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2014, 03:07 PM
 
5,444 posts, read 6,987,107 times
Reputation: 15147
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman249 View Post
How can the markets independently decide if the system is skewed and favors big players like WalMart? Are you suggesting that the small business and WalMart are on a level playing field?
Businesses have NEVER been on an even playing field. I don't agree with the loopholes, but it has always been common practice that when you buy in bulk, the items are cheaper. Now if business A has deeper pockets and can afford to buy more, then they can afford to sell cheaper which will eventually put the other businesses who don't have deep pockets out of business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 03:11 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,979,144 times
Reputation: 5712
Quote:
Originally Posted by headingtoDenver View Post
Businesses have NEVER been on an even playing field. I don't agree with the loopholes, but it has always been common practice that when you buy in bulk, the items are cheaper. Now if business A has deeper pockets and can afford to buy more, then they can afford to sell cheaper which will eventually put the other businesses who don't have deep pockets out of business.
Even at the expense of destroying the middle class and creating poverty stricken centers that are slaves to their retail shops?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 03:13 PM
 
1,706 posts, read 2,435,571 times
Reputation: 1037
Quote:
Originally Posted by headingtoDenver View Post
Businesses have NEVER been on an even playing field. I don't agree with the loopholes, but it has always been common practice that when you buy in bulk, the items are cheaper. Now if business A has deeper pockets and can afford to buy more, then they can afford to sell cheaper which will eventually put the other businesses who don't have deep pockets out of business.
So you don't agree with WalMart getting Billions in subsidies and free land and ... (list goes on).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 04:33 PM
 
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
9,352 posts, read 20,021,771 times
Reputation: 11621
Quote:
Originally Posted by headingtoDenver View Post
Businesses have NEVER been on an even playing field. I don't agree with the loopholes, but it has always been common practice that when you buy in bulk, the items are cheaper. Now if business A has deeper pockets and can afford to buy more, then they can afford to sell cheaper which will eventually put the other businesses who don't have deep pockets out of business.

but a LOT of the depth in Walmart's pockets are subsidized, in MANY ways, by the American taxpayer.... take those subsidies away and let's see how deep those pockets remain......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 04:35 PM
 
5,444 posts, read 6,987,107 times
Reputation: 15147
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman249 View Post
So you don't agree with WalMart getting Billions in subsidies and free land and ... (list goes on).
Keep in mind that these subsidies aren't strictly for Wal-Mart. Other corporations take advantage of them as well. You hear it all the time when a large company wants to open a new factory or office building somewhere, they will actually shop states to see which will give them the biggest tax incentives. Wal-Mart is just playing buy the same rules as everyone else.

Again, I feel that these tax loopholes do need to be closed, but until they are... this is the way it will be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 04:41 PM
 
5,444 posts, read 6,987,107 times
Reputation: 15147
Quote:
Originally Posted by latetotheparty View Post
but a LOT of the depth in Walmart's pockets are subsidized, in MANY ways, by the American taxpayer.... take those subsidies away and let's see how deep those pockets remain......
Every subsidy is paid by the American tax payer. It doesn't matter what it is. The state gives business A a tax break for hiring X number of employees or pays a subsidy. Well, this is tax money that never hits the coffers or is taken out of the coffers. Chances are, tax rates will increase in other areas to offset the tax breaks given.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,694,120 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by WiseManOnceSaid View Post
The new Wal-marts are 150,000 to 180,000 square feet.

Our demand for consumerism plus unchecked regulations created the monster, now that we've seen what the monster can do, I say it's about time to re-focus and regulate.

Bring some jobs back to America, along with a manufacturing sector, and if we do it correctly, perhaps the mighty Wal-Mart will still be around, but will be pro-American again.

How about subsidize Bill's Khaki's or Duluth Pants? Or subsidize manufacturing sector wages? The government needs to give some incentives for the manufacturing sector to start bringing those jobs back to the states. How about instead of giving tax breaks to large retailers, we give the tax breaks to the providers?

There's so many things wrong with corporate America. It mostly comes down to those who have the money call the shots.

It's going to take guts, leadership, and regulations to fix our country. Leaving it in the hands of lobbyists and corporations isn't going to end well for any of us...

I say this as we continue our slide from greatest country in the world down to about 48th and falling....
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandman249 View Post
That's a nice little tid-bit from economics 101, but how do you account for the unfair advantage that WalMart has when it comes to competing with small business. For example:

How do you account for the Billions of Dollars in tax subsidies that WalMart gets?

How do account for the free land that WalMart has been getting in many parts of the country?
You guys (and others) are apparently not aware that business subsidies are given to many businesses, not just Walmart. For example, a local grocery (sort of Mom and Pop-ish) wanted to open a second store in our area. My suburban city was one of the possible locations. I went to a meeting about this and someone asked the CEO what criteria he would use to make a decision. He said "whoever gives us the most money". My city anted up: they sold their soul to get this store.
Louisville extends $1 million in incentives to Alfalfa's to locate at vacant Safeway site - Boulder Daily Camera
** Elected leaders set the stage for the construction of an Alfalfa's Market grocery store on South Boulder Road with a unanimous vote Tuesday night to approve one of the most generous business incentive packages in the city's history.

Alfalfa's, which would locate a 22,000-square-foot store near the site of a long-abandoned Safeway at 707 E. South Boulder Road, would receive a full rebate of the sales tax revenues it generates in the first three years of operation -- capped at $800,000. The natural grocer would also get a 50 percent rebate of the use taxes and permit fees paid to the city.

According to Louisville Economic Development Director Aaron DeJong, the incentive package could amount to $1 million.
**

Now I'd like to see a store there as much as the next person, but this was ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 07:14 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,979,144 times
Reputation: 5712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You guys (and others) are apparently not aware that business subsidies are given to many businesses, not just Walmart. For example, a local grocery (sort of Mom and Pop-ish) wanted to open a second store in our area. My suburban city was one of the possible locations. I went to a meeting about this and someone asked the CEO what criteria he would use to make a decision. He said "whoever gives us the most money". My city anted up: they sold their soul to get this store.
Louisville extends $1 million in incentives to Alfalfa's to locate at vacant Safeway site - Boulder Daily Camera
** Elected leaders set the stage for the construction of an Alfalfa's Market grocery store on South Boulder Road with a unanimous vote Tuesday night to approve one of the most generous business incentive packages in the city's history.

Alfalfa's, which would locate a 22,000-square-foot store near the site of a long-abandoned Safeway at 707 E. South Boulder Road, would receive a full rebate of the sales tax revenues it generates in the first three years of operation -- capped at $800,000. The natural grocer would also get a 50 percent rebate of the use taxes and permit fees paid to the city.

According to Louisville Economic Development Director Aaron DeJong, the incentive package could amount to $1 million.
**

Now I'd like to see a store there as much as the next person, but this was ridiculous.
That's nothing compared to the 12.7 million this town gave to Walmart and the former land owner to come to their town...

Clock ticking on new Broomfield Walmart Supercenter opening - Boulder Daily Camera

1.75 million given by this town: Walmart to Get Tax Break for New Naperville Supercenter - Government - Naperville, IL Patch

12 million here in Ft. Worth $12 million tax break proposed for new Fort Worth Walmart project | wfaa.com Dallas - Fort Worth

OR if you'd like a complete breakdown this watchdog site is a good review of where Walmart uses our tax dollars.

Wal-Mart Subsidy Watch - brought to you by Good Jobs First
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2014, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Charleston, SC
7,103 posts, read 5,979,144 times
Reputation: 5712
Walmart's largest subsidy deals so far by rank: Wal-Mart Subsidy Watch - brought to you by Good Jobs First
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top