Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-22-2016, 08:19 PM
 
3,423 posts, read 4,368,091 times
Reputation: 4226

Advertisements

If it takes "one drop" to be considered not white, how many drops does it take to be considered white?

 
Old 02-22-2016, 10:30 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,387 posts, read 8,152,322 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawa2011 View Post
If it takes "one drop" to be considered not white, how many drops does it take to be considered white?
In America? As long as it was not known that you had a Black ancestor which made you liable to be someones property. Hence many "whites" can claim Asian heritage like TV's second to last Superman Dean Cain or Keanu Reeves, Many like a Chuck Norris can claim , Native American ( many times the Princess Medicine Man or other tribal royalty for lack of a better term) and/or Latino heritage and remain white as long as their physical features don't scream East Asian..
 
Old 02-23-2016, 06:36 AM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,476,450 times
Reputation: 12187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawa2011 View Post
If it takes "one drop" to be considered not white, how many drops does it take to be considered white?
It's based on what people think you look like. Jimmy Kimmel is viewed as White even though his DNA admixture test revealed him to be 10% Sub-Saharan African and 8% North African. Many White Americans with ancestry dating to North America pre 1700 or those with Southern European ancestry have a few non White ancestors yet are considered White. No Drop Rule was based on hate and rewriting history.
 
Old 02-23-2016, 06:40 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Thumbs up If Latinos get considered "white", would Native Americans and Mulattoes/Biracials also be considered "white" by default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuitarHero45 View Post
There's a lot of talk about Latinos being considered white in the future of America because of assimilation or intermarriage, but since a substantial amount of Latinos are of Native(Mayan/Andean) or Triracial/Trigueno descent, would that mean that non-hispanic Native Americans/Metis and non-hispanic Biracials/Mulattos/Creoles will be considered "white" as well in the same process.

If not, wouldn't that be unfair to exclude mixed/full Native Americans and Biracial/Creole people from identifying as "white" while their Latino look-a-likes get to enjoy that benefit?

By all means!

White privilege should be extended to more minority groups.

 
Old 02-23-2016, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,387 posts, read 8,152,322 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawa2011 View Post
If it takes "one drop" to be considered not white, how many drops does it take to be considered white?
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
It's based on what people think you look like. Jimmy Kimmel is viewed as White even though his DNA admixture test revealed him to be 10% Sub-Saharan African and 8% North African. Many White Americans with ancestry dating to North America pre 1700 or those with Southern European ancestry have a few non White ancestors yet are considered White. No Drop Rule was based on hate and rewriting history.
The key is that it wasn't based upon being other than or not white, it was based upon being not black so you could not be owned. Chattel slavery was the major moral failing other inter-ethnic conflicts and anti Asian bias palled in comparison
 
Old 02-23-2016, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Poshawa, Ontario
2,982 posts, read 4,101,035 times
Reputation: 5622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
It was so a slave owner could assert property rights on that single drop and any child she had
If I am not mistaken, slavery has been abolished in America since the Emancipation Proclamaition on 1 January 1863. So can someone please explain to me why this is still a thing 153 years after the fact?

Way to keep up with the times, America.
 
Old 02-23-2016, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Elysium
12,387 posts, read 8,152,322 times
Reputation: 9199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annuvin View Post
If I am not mistaken, slavery has been abolished in America since the Emancipation Proclamaition on 1 January 1863. So can someone please explain to me why this is still a thing 153 years after the fact?

Way to keep up with the times, America.
Well that was the basis of American race relations, that's why Turk's are "white" or more precisely not "black " in America versus being an other in Europe
 
Old 02-23-2016, 03:03 PM
 
2,540 posts, read 2,756,349 times
Reputation: 3891
Quote:
Originally Posted by censusdata View Post
Jimmy Kimmel is viewed as White even though his DNA admixture test revealed him to be 10% Sub-Saharan African and 8% North African.
Where did you get that information of Kimmel from? I saw his episode of "finding your roots" and there was no mention whatsoever of any black ancestors. His father's ancestry is German and his mother's ancestry is Italian.
 
Old 02-23-2016, 03:29 PM
 
39 posts, read 64,897 times
Reputation: 43
In the future, white people will become the minority. The darker genes are stronger and more prominent than whiter genes. Whenever a white person breeds with a darker person, the offsprings always come out darker than the white parent.

In the future, most people will be mixed with everything, there will be no race or ethnicities anymore
 
Old 02-27-2016, 02:31 PM
 
8,572 posts, read 8,540,170 times
Reputation: 4684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annuvin View Post
The opinions of the U.S. government doesn't mean diddly-squat to those of us that do not live there.

Seriously... Some basement-dwelling number-crunching bureaucrat can file Mexicans under any racial category he or she chooses, place.


Except that he didn't. It was the Hispanics themselves, who agitated for a separate census classification, most likely to allow statistical data to be collected to allow an assessment of their condition.


They were certainly NOT treated as whites prior to this, and a viewing of the "West Side Story" is indicative of this. Note that Puerto Ricans are among the "whiter looking" major Latino groups in the USA.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top