Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-12-2017, 01:21 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,061 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30204

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pub-911 View Post
And the distance from Boston to Minneapolis is about 1,400 miles, which is what the Orient Express has been doing in one form or another since 1883.

At the end the day, there are no hard and fast rules here. Different modes of transportation will be appropriate under different circumstances. Having choices is what will be of benefit to the consumer.
How large are the subsidies for the Orient Express?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-12-2017, 01:39 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,061 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30204
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
The four track NYC Subway system is the equivalent of a 36 lane superhighway crisscrossing Manhattan, in terms of passenger capacity.
I spend lots of time in Manhattan. The problem is the lack of "criss-crossing." There are few crosstown lines. One is, in part, the new Second Avenue Line (link to map), which parellels 63rd Street from Second Avenue to Seventh Avenue. It loses much of its crosstown usefulness since it's only stops arguably in the crosstown direction are 72nd and 2nd, 63rd and Lexington and then 57th Street and 7th Avenue. Another is the No. 7 train, which stops at Grand Central, then 5th Avenue and 42nd Street, then Times Square, and then Hudson Yard at 34th Street and 11th Avenue. A highly useful stop at 42nd Street and 11 Avenue was cut for budgetary reasons. Last and definitely least is the L Train, which has five stops from First Avenue to Eighth Avenue on 14th Street. The problem is that it runs infrequently and is decrepit. They are shutting it down in Manhattan for 18 months starting in 2018 to repair damage from Hurricane Sandy.

So in you're a suburbanite coming in to Grand Central Terminal or Penn Station, or someone living on the Upper East Side and going elsewhere on the East Side or to the Battery, or someone living on the Upper West Side and going elsewhere on the West Side or to the Battery, subways are great. Otherwise not so much.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
The fact that no city can keep expanding highway lanes to service the ever growing number of commuters means that America will have to "Get Back on Track."
Rubbish. The problem with highways is that we went from one car per family to one car per family member over 16 or 17 between the late 1940's or earlier when most highways were conceived or built, to modern times.Peopel are not capable of driving more than one car at a time. As for intercity travel even the most heavily traveled line, the Northeast Corridor from Boston to New York City to Washington cannot possibly carry enough people to make even a small dent in the average I-95 traffic jam in Connecticut or NJ Turnpike traffic jam in New Jersey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2017, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,023 posts, read 14,198,297 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
Rubbish. The problem with highways is that we went from one car per family to one car per family member over 16 or 17 between the late 1940's or earlier when most highways were conceived or built, to modern times.
Not rubbish. Simple math. Population has more than quadrupled from 1900 to 2010 (76M to 320M). Road capacity cannot expand in proportion to that population growth.
Railways can.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2017, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Berwick, Penna.
16,215 posts, read 11,331,262 times
Reputation: 20828
There are a number of areas where the land available for new freeways has pretty much been exhausted -- Long Island and most of the Los Angeles basin come immediately to mind, and the list is growing.

The solution here will likely be to develop more "park and ride" options; New Jersey Transit now allows 110 MPH speeds on most of its Northeast Corridor line -- some of it within the city limits of Newark; and a parking facility at Jersey Avenue in New Brunswick has made commuting from locations as far south as Browns Mills and Wrightstown a viable option.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2017, 07:20 PM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,014,781 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Not rubbish. Simple math. Population has more than quadrupled from 1900 to 2010 (76M to 320M). Road capacity cannot expand in proportion to that population growth.
Railways can.

Railroads have been operating at capacity or near it for years.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2017, 07:41 PM
 
Location: New York Area
35,061 posts, read 16,995,362 times
Reputation: 30204
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetgraphics View Post
Not rubbish. Simple math. Population has more than quadrupled from 1900 to 2010 (76M to 320M). Road capacity cannot expand in proportion to that population growth.
Railways can.
There were almost no roads at all in 1900 so the percentage increase would be almost infinite. The relevant metric is road expansion vs. licensed driver expansion between roughly 1960, when much of the Interstate system was built and nowadays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-12-2017, 08:50 PM
 
4,314 posts, read 3,995,499 times
Reputation: 7797
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
Railroads have been operating at capacity or near it for years.........


Not since Obama's war on coal.


The number of trains coming thru a mainline track near me has dropped by over 50%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2017, 12:12 AM
 
24,559 posts, read 18,248,333 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by David A Stone View Post
Not since Obama's war on coal.


The number of trains coming thru a mainline track near me has dropped by over 50%
Coal hasn't been used to operate trains for 100 years. This is a thread about passenger rail.

Coal for electricity generation also can't compete against fracked natural gas which is now around $3/MMBtu. Coal is dead because of the economics. I don't care what Trump promises voters in West Virginia, it ain't happenin'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2017, 03:35 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,023 posts, read 14,198,297 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbgusa View Post
There were almost no roads at all in 1900 so the percentage increase would be almost infinite. The relevant metric is road expansion vs. licensed driver expansion between roughly 1960, when much of the Interstate system was built and nowadays.
Facts do not support your opinions. You might benefit from reading history. There were plenty of roads before 1900. The big difference was that most roads were privately owned (or upon private property with easements). Ditto, for bridges, ferries, trains, canals, etc, etc.

Not only were all cities, towns and villages crisscrossed with ROADS, there were long distance roads, as well. The Philadelphia and Lancaster Turnpike opened between Lancaster and Philadelphia in 1794, the first successful turnpike in the United States. . . 106 years before 1900.

Example of private infrastructure converted to public:
Wilkes-Barre, news, sports, obituaries, and classifieds for Luzerne County and Scranton | The Times Leader, Wilkes-Barre, Scranton PA - www.timesleader.com
"The Luzerne County Commissioners had bought the bridge [in 1908] for $165,000 and would soon buy many others throughout the county, ending the time-honored practice of letting private companies build bridges and then operate them for profit."
- - -
Almost all infrastructure was once privately owned and not taxpayer subsidized.
- - - -
Library of Congress has a nice collection of roadmaps before 1900 A.D.
https://www.loc.gov/maps/
- - - -
And, no, the Interstate Highway System did not create the expansion of drivers nor substantially boost road mileage. Coincidentally, superhighways do not eliminate traffic congestion, but add to it.
Do New Highways Generate Traffic? - ACCESS Magazine
Conclusion

New roads generate substantial new traffic in metropolitan regions. A 1.0 percent increase in lane miles induces a 0.9 percent increase in VMT within five years. With so much induced traffic, adding road capacity does little to reduce congestion.
- - - -
A superhighway / interstate has a maximum observed capacity of about 2,400 passengers per hour per lane. But motorists assume they will have a higher average speed and seek those routes, adding to the traffic congestion. But the existence of those limited access roads did not "create" new drivers nor sell automobiles.

Achievements BEFORE government took over the infrastructure - - -
World’s most railroad track mileage :
[] Peak heavy rail mileage: 254,000 miles (less than 160,000 miles today)
[] Streetcar track: 34,404 miles by 1907, in over 140 cities, with 60,000 cars in service.
[] Interurban track: 15,500 miles by 1917
(Total rail mileage was once over 300,000 miles - now, far less)
In contrast - - -
[] Interstate Highway System : 47,714 miles

In short, America was better connected by RAIL long before interstate highways came about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2017, 03:38 AM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,023 posts, read 14,198,297 times
Reputation: 16747
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
Railroads have been operating at capacity or near it for years.........
Re: passenger rail?
Not at all.
Re: freight?
Not at all.

Due to taxes and regulations, many rail companies reduced their rights of way to lower costs (a very very stupid move - thanks to greedy government). You do not reduce your track miles if you're at capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top