Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's not because students felt unsafe hearing her "ideas"
The students said they felt unsafe with those ideas being expressed. They lobbied for "safe zones" which in practice was the entire campus.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reneeh63
I thought the university didn't think they could secure the area against expected protests - that's MUCH different.
It's still a disgrace that a university would allow violence to overrule reason. My feeling is that any student engaging in violence for any reason should be expelled or at the least suspended. Violence has no place at an institution of learning.
I sure don't feel unsafe. I would go nowhere this pond scum
I don't see the Right rioting. It appears to me that the street riots and yelling and screaming matches originate with the sickos on the Left.
As for this "honoree", it is a disgrace that a murderer like this should be honored in any way. If I was a cop, knowing that he bombed (or caused the bombing, of a police barracks) I would call in sick that day
This is a disgrace, but its liberal heaven NYC.....
Conservatives ALWAYS Feel "Unsafe", which is why the KKK was born.
If you'd read up on your history you'd know the KKK was founded by the Democratic Party as a way to keep those newly freed slaves "in their place". Those slaves that were emancipated by a Republican president. And were freed and made citizens and given the right to vote by the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, which were opposed by all or virtually all Democrats in the Senate and House. The list goes on, but Democrats have a much darker history when it comes to slavery and blacks in general. And no, I'm not a Republican, but I did learn my history.
If you'd read up on your history you'd know the KKK was founded by the Democratic Party as a way to keep those newly freed slaves "in their place". Those slaves that were emancipated by a Republican president. And were freed and made citizens and given the right to vote by the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments, which were opposed by all or virtually all Democrats in the Senate and House. The list goes on, but Democrats have a much darker history when it comes to slavery and blacks in general. And no, I'm not a Republican, but I did learn my history.
If you really did know your history you would also know that the stances on the parties changed. The Democrats were pro state rights, Republicans wanted centralized power. Now does that sound like the stance each one of those parties would take today?
If you really did know your history you would also know that the stances on the parties changed. The Democrats were pro state rights, Republicans wanted centralized power. Now does that sound like the stance each one of those parties would take today?
Well that make sense, considering it was the Republicans that pushed through the Civil Rights Act in the 60s..
Politics may be intense, but it doesn't always make for a Great Debate - as is demonstrated in the responses here. Please keep partisan politics in the designated forum - Politics & Other Controversies.
Please also remember to check existing threads first over there - busy forum with lots of people pinging off similar topics and themes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
