Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-06-2017, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Central IL
20,726 posts, read 16,355,663 times
Reputation: 50373

Advertisements

Does anyone REALLY care what anyone does any more? We can all debate on whether we personally want to do it but it doesn't impact me what others do. But....part of that impact means no new tax breaks...in fact get rid of any tax break based on marital/relationship status.

 
Old 08-06-2017, 03:39 PM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,659 posts, read 87,023,434 times
Reputation: 131617
Quote:
Originally Posted by reed067 View Post
Been on this forum for a while now and I can't remember seeing a topic on this. If there was I might of missed it or it was before I got here.
... just few times...
(Please use SEARCH feature)

Are polygamist relationships becoming more mainstream and are the future?

How do you guys feel about polyamory?

"Co-wives"; the next frontier

http://www.city-data.com/forum/great...-polygamy.html

Should a man have as many wives as he wants?

Why are so many people seeking poly relationships?

Why Not Legalize Polygamy?

Montana polygamist family applies for marriage license - The polyamorous movement

Should polygamous marriage be legal?

Does polygamy have a place in Western society?

Christian Polyamory

God Specifically States He Approves of Polygamy

+ probably a dozen or two more. Polygamy, polyamory...Some short threads, some closed. Discussed at nauseam...

BTW: Here is your very own thread:

Polyamory

Last edited by elnina; 08-06-2017 at 03:50 PM..
 
Old 08-06-2017, 10:09 PM
 
3,320 posts, read 5,567,238 times
Reputation: 9681
It can and does work for some people just like marriage can and does work for some people. In all relationships there are problems.

I would not be interested in polyamory because I don't want to sleep with someone that is sleeping with someone else. Also, it seems to me that in any relationship one party is more attached than the other. My guess is that if you were to get truly honest answers from two people in a polyamorous relationship - one would prefer it be monogamous.

I realize that one person can't be 'everything' to another but I still don't want to share.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 05:34 AM
 
3,636 posts, read 3,424,247 times
Reputation: 4324
Quote:
Originally Posted by brrabbit View Post
The more humans involved, the more complex it becomes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaminhealth View Post
It has to take "very special" minds to want to be in poly relationships. Being with one is a full time pretty tough job.
A mistake there would be to assume the relationship dynamics and their difficulties would increase proportionally with extra people. All relationships are a challenge - but moving from 2 to 3 people does not mean all the difficulties and stresses of a relationship also increase 50%.

Quite the opposite can be true - and there is an "economies of scale" effect on many of the relationship issues where quite a lot of things simply become easier. Other things become harder. And in the end I think for many it simply balances out so a truple (as we lovingly call it) ends up no tougher a job than being in a couple.

Whether that trend continues - or differs - with the addition of subsequent people up to 4 - 5 - 10 - 50 I simply do not know however.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 06:53 AM
 
Location: Colorado Springs
15,219 posts, read 10,302,595 times
Reputation: 32198
While I personally would not want to be in a polygamous marriage, I don't think there should be laws against it. We are supposed to have freedom to practice our religion, no matter what it is, so if your religion allows more than one spouse well then the government should keep their noses out of it.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 07:12 AM
 
11,411 posts, read 7,799,958 times
Reputation: 21923
Don't really care what people want to do, but no way should you be able to have multiple LEGAL marriages. Why not you say? Because then every spouse and their children would be entitled to SS survivor benefits. Now if the laws were changed that SS payments had to be divided equally between legal spouses/children then that's ok. If each additional legal spouse/child received an additional 100% benefit, you'd have SS being paid out multiple times for the same earner. I think we can agree that SS would sink even faster under that sort of thing.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,452 posts, read 4,748,347 times
Reputation: 15354
Legally speaking, if the state has no right to dictate the genders involved in a marriage then the state has no right to dictate how many people can be in it either. We've already abandoned the traditional one man one women model of marriage.


Morally speaking it depends on the people involved. I don't think we're generally wired for such relationships, particularly for ones involving multiple men and one or more women. Women are generally more open to sharing a good man than men are regarding a good woman.


I use the qualifier "generally" for a reason though. Generally men are attracted to women and women to men but we all know there are exceptions to that. There are exceptions to everything, just about. If a group of exceptions happen to meet and are able to form a good relationship together, that's their business. I think more often than not you will find some people are enjoying the relationship while others feel pressured in to it because of a primary attraction to one member of the group, or because of insecurities. There are all sorts of ways those relationships could form in very unhealthy and exploitative ways. Same is true of traditional couples as well though.


I certainly hope such arrangements remain a fringe model and never go mainstream though. If we were all pressured in to such relationships from an early age I think there would be a lot of unhappy people and a lot of social instability. Even more than we have now, I mean.
 
Old 08-07-2017, 08:02 AM
SFX
 
Location: Tennessee
1,636 posts, read 890,055 times
Reputation: 1337
Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
BTW: Here is your very own thread:

Polyamory
That made me lol
 
Old 08-07-2017, 08:12 AM
 
19,014 posts, read 27,569,699 times
Reputation: 20264
Polygamy and polyamory are by far not the same.
Life long love to one person is a well marketed by society myth. There are reasons for that that may take pages and pages of fiery posts. But one who is true to their feelings, will likely agree with it.
Surely, there may be exclusions to this statement. Out of yey many people on earth, why not. But they are not THE RULE.
Polyamory is natural state. Love is not a limb attached to a body. It is an ever changing, fluctuating feeling. It is state of loving that can be as capricious as human mind. Besides, most of the time love is confused for affection. And affection is a VERY impermanent thing, but marriage came, laws enforced and so we go...
 
Old 08-07-2017, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee, WI
3,368 posts, read 2,887,413 times
Reputation: 2967
Quote:
Originally Posted by UNC4Me View Post
Don't really care what people want to do, but no way should you be able to have multiple LEGAL marriages. Why not you say? Because then every spouse and their children would be entitled to SS survivor benefits. Now if the laws were changed that SS payments had to be divided equally between legal spouses/children then that's ok. If each additional legal spouse/child received an additional 100% benefit, you'd have SS being paid out multiple times for the same earner. I think we can agree that SS would sink even faster under that sort of thing.
Maybe we should eliminate SS survivor benefit? Or maybe we shall make a total payout amount proportionally divided? Just because our current laws are written so, it does not mean they cannot (or should not) be changed. As Mr Huckabee correctly noticed once, even Constitution is not a Bible and can therefore be changed if needed.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top