Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-20-2019, 10:53 AM
 
13,254 posts, read 8,327,695 times
Reputation: 31427

Advertisements

Nah. The lemmings just do a free fall ...all together.

China regulates gender population.

Black widow spiders...the same.

If gender keeps being renamed/classified..we won't need to be of concern....since "self identifying' is an intriguing way to hinder procreation. Every self identifying person for them self!

 
Old 01-20-2019, 10:54 AM
 
Location: The Driftless Area, WI
7,113 posts, read 4,951,885 times
Reputation: 17437
I don't think Betty Zane or Molly Pitcher got the memo.


BTW- Black Widows don't become widows until after the male has served his purpose....And "Self Identity", not to mention homosexuality, are evolutionary dead ends. As Seinfeld would say, their team has to be constantly recruiting new members. They can't manufacture them.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 11:04 AM
 
Location: City Data Land
17,156 posts, read 12,855,605 times
Reputation: 33163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nov3 View Post
Nah. The lemmings just do a free fall ...all together.

China regulates gender population.

Black widow spiders...the same.

If gender keeps being renamed/classified..we won't need to be of concern....since "self identifying' is an intriguing way to hinder procreation. Every self identifying person for them self!
Not anymore. They are allowing two kids after the gender imbalance became so serious men started having problems finding mates.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 11:08 AM
 
96 posts, read 78,662 times
Reputation: 278
Women are more important than men.


A woman can only have one child per year for maybe ten childbearing years, while a man can father any number of children for many years.


If you want to destroy a culture or civilization, get rid of their women, and the culture and civilization will eventually die out.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 11:23 AM
 
6,835 posts, read 2,371,651 times
Reputation: 2727
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarstowC View Post
Women are more important than men.


A woman can only have one child per year for maybe ten childbearing years, while a man can father any number of children for many years.


If you want to destroy a culture or civilization, get rid of their women, and the culture and civilization will eventually die out.
A woman might be limited to having one pregnancy episode a year, there is such a thing as carrying 2 or more kids during that episode. Let's not forget there is also adoption and foster children.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:08 PM
 
6,688 posts, read 4,669,499 times
Reputation: 25616
No.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:21 PM
 
Location: AZ
757 posts, read 829,014 times
Reputation: 3375
Could I be allowed to choose who drops dead? That could sway my opinion.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:27 PM
 
8,787 posts, read 6,123,839 times
Reputation: 12061
Quote:
Originally Posted by guidoLaMoto View Post
The concept originates in the mathematics of biology: one male can initiate the pregnancies of many women contemporaneously, but one woman can only carry one pregnancy at a time...ie- a clan could perpetuate itself nicely with one male and many females, but a clan with one female and many males would be doomed to extinction.


That concept may have morphed thru the years into the "protect the weak" mentality, but ever since the invention of gun powder, size & strength doesn't mean so much any more.


As Zoisite points out above, given our huge world population now, losing a few (even a million at a time) still leaves plenty of folks left over to keep the species going.


"Fire!...Oughta my way!" ---George Costanza
Couldn't we also break this down further into pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women? Pre-menopausal women would hold the biological value while post-menopausal women would have no biological value. Now if the OP's hypothetical 123 million women to die were all elderly women wouldn't that help tremendously with the anticipated social security, pension and healthcare imbalances on the economic front?
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,633 posts, read 14,725,582 times
Reputation: 34554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks View Post
Not anymore. They are allowing two kids after the gender imbalance became so serious men started having problems finding mates.

That's absolutely NOT the reason why China changed to a 2-child policy. That stuff about gender imbalance and Chinese men not finding mates was just a spiteful nonsense rumour that got started in USA around 2005 and then it spread via internet. Here are the real reasons why China changed to a 2-child policy so that SOME families (not all) are now allowed or are subsidized for two children. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-child_policy


BTW, the United Kingdom has a 2-child policy now too. I give it another 20 years and USA will be instituting a 1 or 2 child policy too.


.
 
Old 01-20-2019, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,633 posts, read 14,725,582 times
Reputation: 34554
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtkinsonDan View Post
Couldn't we also break this down further into pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women? Pre-menopausal women would hold the biological value while post-menopausal women would have no biological value. Now if the OP's hypothetical 123 million women to die were all elderly women wouldn't that help tremendously with the anticipated social security, pension and healthcare imbalances on the economic front?
Social security, pension and healthcare WHERE, in what countries? Not all countries are equal in those things and not all countries have equal birth rates.

If the deaths of the 123 million women occurred scattered about the world it wouldn't make any difference if they were pre-menopausal or post-menopausal and it would have no impact on benefits in places where benefits exist. If the deaths occurred in one single country that happens to have social security, pension and healthcare benefits (which not all countries do) then the impact and imbalance the deaths has on the rest of that one country's population and civilization would be so devastating it would overshadow any impact on benefits and no matter if the women were pre or post menopausal, that wouldn't be a consideration and their age and breeding capability would be irrelevant.


.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top