Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-19-2009, 08:41 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,400 posts, read 8,030,217 times
Reputation: 2871

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Purple_Princess View Post
SO WHAT !! As long as a woman can have a baby and then LEGALLY FORCE a man to financially support the baby they SHOULD have a say. It isn't fair to attach responsibility without input. Reminds me of taxation without representation. We can dig in your pockets but you have no opinion on the matter.
The point was that the man doesnt have to carry the thing and pop something the size of a watermelon out of something the size of a walnut.
The man doesnt carry it, its not the man's body. Therefore woman's choice what she does with HER body.

The woman has the CHOICE to have a baby, and once the baby exists she can still CHOOSE whether or not to force him to financially support the baby or just do it alone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2009, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colddiamond102 View Post
The man doesnt carry it, its not the man's body. Therefore woman's choice what she does with HER body.
You seem to be forgetting about another important "body"...the CHILD's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 09:22 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,400 posts, read 8,030,217 times
Reputation: 2871
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
You seem to be forgetting about another important "body"...the CHILD's.
Thats not a CHILD in there..thats a lump of cells. Furthermore, its a parasitic lump of cells until it pops out and can somewhat function/live on its own.

The life of the mother is more important, IMHO, than something that feeds off of her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 09:28 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colddiamond102 View Post
Thats not a CHILD in there..thats a lump of cells. Furthermore, its a parasitic lump of cells until it pops out and can somewhat function/live on its own.

The life of the mother is more important, IMHO, than something that feeds off of her.
A lump of cells? Really? Wow...

Your cavalier attitude and that of others like you really gets to me. You child-murder supporters say anything and everything you can to justify the way you feel and even call these innocent children "parastic lumps of cells" and "things."

As I said earlier on this thread, I'm OK with allowing abortion during the first trimester ONLY...at least for now. But after that...absolutely not.

Last edited by afoigrokerkok; 03-19-2009 at 09:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 09:52 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,400 posts, read 8,030,217 times
Reputation: 2871
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
A lump of cells? Really? Wow...

Your cavalier attitude and that of others like you really gets to me. You child-murder supporters say anything and everything you can to justify the way you feel and even call these innocent children "parastic lumps of cells" and "things."

As I said earlier on this thread, I'm OK with allowing abortion during the first trimester ONLY...at least for now. But after that...absolutely not.
Perhaps I worded it wrong..Im doing 3 things at once and most definately havent read this entire thread. I consider it to be a lump of cells until after the 1st trimester. After that, the relationship is still parasitic, but you're still going to have to pop it out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 09:54 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colddiamond102 View Post
Perhaps I worded it wrong..Im doing 3 things at once and most definately havent read this entire thread. I consider it to be a lump of cells until after the 1st trimester. After that, the relationship is still parasitic, but you're still going to have to pop it out.
So you agree that 2nd trimester abortions should be banned? Because that's what I have such a big problem with being permitted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2009, 10:00 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
3,400 posts, read 8,030,217 times
Reputation: 2871
Quote:
Originally Posted by afoigrokerkok View Post
So you agree that 2nd trimester abortions should be banned? Because that's what I have such a big problem with being permitted.
I wouldnt go so far as to say banned, because there ARE grey areas to this subject.
Instead I would say that after the 1st trimester, any possibility of terminating that pregnancy should be heavily examined in a case-by-case basis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2009, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colddiamond102 View Post
I wouldnt go so far as to say banned, because there ARE grey areas to this subject.
Instead I would say that after the 1st trimester, any possibility of terminating that pregnancy should be heavily examined in a case-by-case basis.
IMO, the only case where it should be allowed in the second trimester is if continuing the pregnancy would cause a significant risk to the life of the mother.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2009, 11:25 AM
 
Location: San Francisco & Fort Worth & Now, Back to IRAQ
2,870 posts, read 3,369,800 times
Reputation: 5678
Its up to the individual and strangers need to BUT OUT!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2009, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,975 posts, read 16,457,651 times
Reputation: 4586
Quote:
Originally Posted by x2cme View Post
Its up to the individual and strangers need to BUT OUT!!!
I'm not "BUTTing out"....we have to protect the children from the carless and selfish attitudes of their "parents" who (99.9999999% of the time) CHOSE to have sex KNOWING a pregnancy could result.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top