Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm empathetic with everyone who deserves my empathy. I start with the most defenseless and go from there. The ones I have the least empathy for are those who would sacrfice others for their own selfishness.
That is probably because he has insuficient command of his view points to be able to craft a cogent arguement. I run into people like that (sometimes) in the classes I teach at the university. The best thing, IMHO, to do with them is to continue refocus them on the question. Eventually they just get tired and go away.
Only once did such a person tell me that the question was invalid. That was an interesting discussion.
In this case EEEEEEE is just destroying his credibility for his stance on ... well ... almost anything.
I'm empathetic with everyone who deserves my empathy. I start with the most defenseless and go from there. The ones I have the least empathy for are those who would sacrfice others for their own selfishness.
OK<..... you are empathetic. ... I'll give you that....
Now that we've agreed on that one topic, tell me...using your best empathy now: At what age is a child too young to be tortured? Or is torture ok at any age?
We've already covered that, dear. If you can't remember our conversatiions, I don't have time for you.
I remember our conversations quite well. And you have yet to explain your support of the slaughter of innocent children as collateral damage in a war that protects Americans.
You state over and over that the klling of ALL children is immoral; yet you then turn around and condone killing in war.
And apparently you DO have time for me because you respond to every one of my posts. I must be hitting a few nerves, huh?
Bush's war cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
Bush's war drove the terrorists from Afganistan into Pakistan.
Bush's war in Iraq was unjust.
Bush's war in Afganistan wasted valuable resouces, even though it was necessary, it was poorly prosecuted.
Bush was incompetent.
As to your assertion that someone can't read--get real. If they couldn't read, how could they argue with you on a text driven forum?
Bush turned a bitter ally who threatened America into a stable prosperous peaceful democracy. There isn't much better result you can have from a war. In addition, Bin Laden threatened to kill millions of Americans. Bush prevented that from happening. At most, 65,000 died in the Iraq War. Well under the carnage Bin Laden promised. We will never be able to thank George W. Bush enough.
I'm empathetic with everyone who deserves my empathy. I start with the most defenseless and go from there. The ones I have the least empathy for are those who would sacrfice others for their own selfishness.
By the way, it's not "empathetic". It's "empathic". There's no such word as "empathetic". Get a dictionary.
That is probably because he has insuficient command of his view points to be able to craft a cogent arguement. I run into people like that (sometimes) in the classes I teach at the university. The best thing, IMHO, to do with them is to continue refocus them on the question. Eventually they just get tired and go away.
Only once did such a person tell me that the question was invalid. That was an interesting discussion.
In this case EEEEEEE is just destroying his credibility for his stance on ... well ... almost anything.
Good God, it's scary if this kind of liberal pap is getting anywhere NEAR our young people. I'm so glad my son got 5s on his AP tests. Now he doesn't have to take History and English classes in college; areas of study that are hotbeds of kooky liberal professors. Thank God he's in Engineering, an area that is relatively devoid of the leftwing crap.
EEE - it wasn't dumbass Bush's role or place to turn any country into a "peaceful democracy."
That's not OUR problem...we need to focus on Americans, not people 6,000 miles away.
They didn't want it anyway, yet Bush still felt the need to risk the lives of millions of AMERICAN young men for his little folly, not to mention digging us down the crapper economically.
By the way, it's not "empathetic". It's "empathic". There's no such word as "empathetic". Get a dictionary.
It can be either one, dear. Get a dictionary.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
