Are men obligated? (school, education, state, income)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And vasectomies are easy to get. I would say about 89% of men should get one immediately.
Please tell me you are joking???!!??? How about the teenage pregnancies? Or men who would like to have children at a later stage with their wives? Should ALL of those young men also go through this medical procedure?
It is wrong to say men should get vasectomies...akin to saying all women should get their tubes tied!!!! We have to be fair here....
So if she decided to keep the child (her choice, her body) if the guy makes it clear that he does not want the baby, shouldn't he be exempt from having to pay up? For instance women who have babies with diff men... Is it right for them to ask each of the daddies to pay up?
If the man does not want a baby, he should prevent that from happening, either by not having sex, or using birth control. Leaving even a small percentage to chance is just that- leaving a small percentage of possibility that an unplanned pregnancy could occur.
But I'm wondering... what would prevent a man from saying "yeah, let's have a baby!" and then once the baby is here saying "Nah...I told her I didn't want a kid and so I'm not going to pay a dime!"...
I don't understand what you are saying about the multiple fathers... did the woman try to "trap" them somehow? Whether she has other kids, by one or multiple fathers, really doesn't (IMO) have any bearing on whether the father should be able to shirk his responsibilty. Should he provide support for her other children? Of course not. For his own? Of course.
So the woman does not have to have the baby if she does not want to, but the man has to care for the baby if he did not want one? To me that sounds like a double standard.
First, just because abortion is still legal does not mean that everyone actually has access to an abortion facility. There are lots of states where it is nearly impossible to get an abortion.
Second, if both people had sex willingly then they did so with the knowledge that pregnancy could result. Both are taking that risk and all the consequences that come with it.
Is anyone suggesting that if a woman becomes pregnant and does not want the child, but the man does that she should have to go through with the pregnancy? That'll work out just great I'm sure (sarcasm intended). Then what? Where's the next legal and moral step in this chain?
If everyone knows how the legal situation lies now, then is there really anyone getting the short end of the stick (aside from the aforementioned child?) ?
One post seemed to suggest that birth control is only the woman's responsibility. I disagree. If you don't want a financial or legal responsibility, then take care that you don't get one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.