Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Well officer, the guy LOOKED like he might rob me, so I walked up to him and shot him in the face" is not self-defense, and what you're trying to claim NV is saying.
NV is saying, quite clearly I might add, that should someone walk up to him with a gun or knife, and demanded his wallet and cellphone, THEN NV would shoot him in the face.
NV is saying, quite clearly I might add, that should someone walk up to him with a gun or knife, and demanded his wallet and cellphone, THEN NV would shoot him in the face.
.
And I would run away. That's the difference between people who want to maximize and who want to minimize the number of gunshot killings.
No matter how good NV is with a gun, sooner or later he will run into somebody better (or luckier). NV is a good state for him to be living in, if he is that kind of a high roller, but I'm not.
And I would run away. That's the difference between people who want to maximize and who want to minimize the number of gunshot killings.
No matter how good NV is with a gun, sooner or later he will run into somebody better (or luckier). NV is a good state for him to be living in, if he is that kind of a high roller, but I'm not.
"And I would run away." and chances are, depending on which area you are accosted, merely die tired as the criminal shoots you in the back.
I also do not appreciate your ad hominem either.
We pro-gun-right people don't want to "maximize the number of gunshot killings", ignoring for the moment that the vast majority of criminal killings with firearms occur with illegally aquired firearms.
"And I would run away." and chances are, depending on which area you are accosted, merely die tired as the criminal shoots you in the back.
I also do not appreciate your ad hominem either.
We pro-gun-right people don't want to "maximize the number of gunshot killings", ignoring for the moment that the vast majority of criminal killings with firearms occur with illegally aquired firearms.
Ad hominems are perfectly appropriate responses to arguments that are based entirely on one's personal behavioral preference, without offering any factual data to support the "I'd rather" argument.
It's time for you to provide statistical data that supports that a person who walks away from a robber is more likely to be shot than not. Or whatever the hell you mean by "chances are", which is a pretty vacant presentation of persuasive data.
Ad hominems are perfectly appropriate responses to arguments that are based entirely on one's personal behavioral preference, without offering any factual data to support the "I'd rather" argument.
It's time for you to provide statistical data that supports that a person who walks away from a robber is more likely to be shot than not. Or whatever the hell you mean by "chances are", which is a pretty vacant presentation of persuasive data.
considering, you can't prove that ANYONE successfully runs away from an armed assailant unscathed....
this isnt the movies bucko. people die from that ****
considering, you can't prove that ANYONE successfully runs away from an armed assailant unscathed....
this isnt the movies bucko. people die from that ****
How many armed assailants have you shot? Or are you one of those who died from that ****? This isn't the movies bucko.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.