Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2010, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Lincoln County Road or Armageddon
5,014 posts, read 7,219,447 times
Reputation: 7298

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
This one sums in up in a nutshell. Note that insurance rates must be approved by the state and there are barriers to exit the market. So, the state can not allow rate increases and then make it a long expensive process to stop selling your product at a loss.

Gov. Charlie Crist is to blame for State Farm's departure.

Florida insurer ends home policies after rate hike fails - Jan. 27, 2009

The main solution of the FL government was to expand Citizens insurance company. You WILL hear about them the next time a major hurricane hits Florida they will approach the US govt. for a bailout because they (admittedly) won't charge the needed rates to people. Congratulations, you are likely right now subsidizing beach front mansions in Miami with your tax dolalrs.

Bills would raise Citizens Insurance rates by 5 to 20 percent - St. Petersburg Times
Or maybe you're helping out a middle class family who was dumped by State Farm after paying their premiums loyally for years. Trust me, nobody in Florida wants to rely on Citizens for insurance, but when companies collect premiums for YEARS and then bail at the first sign of trouble, it's either Citizens or "Yippitty Insurance Company" or nothing, and we all know how understanding mortgage companies are about not having insurance. This problem- not taxes,not the housing bubble, not unemployment- is what will be Florida's death knell.
Selling at a loss? Insurance companies? Give me a break. I say if they bolt, take away their licenses to sell ANY kind of insurance in the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2010, 06:18 PM
 
Location: Lake Kimble, TX.
240 posts, read 537,273 times
Reputation: 258
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeard View Post
money already dominates politics, and it looks to do only moreso in the future. How corporations and other organizations came to have the same "rights" as people (eg free speech) is ridiculous. In addition, they hardly have the same responsibilities.
I see it as no different than what occurred in the November 2008 election with one candidate:

Timmerman disclosed that the FEC compiled a database of potentially questionable overseas donations totaling $3.38 million. The funds came from such places as Abu Dhabi, Beijing, and Ethiopia.
In June, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a speech in which he claimed foreign nationals were contributing to Obama’s campaign.

Timmerman also reported that donors from the Gaza Strip had contributed $33,000 to the Obama campaign through the purchase of Obama T-shirts they had shipped to Gaza.

Timmerman published a new report on Oct. 8, disclosing that an investigation of Obama’s campaign finance reports turned up more than 2,000 cases in which individuals made donations far above the legal limit of $2,300 per election.
For example, in August the campaign filed a report listing a single donation from a Debra Myers in “Rancho Palos Verde, Calif.,” for $28,500, and a $28,500 contribution from a donor identified as Woodrow Myers Jr.

Timmerman followed up with a new report on Oct. 19, disclosing that more than 37,000 Obama donations appeared to be conversions of foreign currency, totaling as much as $63 million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2010, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,928,948 times
Reputation: 36644
I wish people would follow the rules and put meaningful titles on their threads, so I wouldn't have to open this thread to see what it is about every time somebody responds to it. If I were a moderator, I'd delete all threads that lack descriptive titles. I guess that's why I'm not a moderator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 08:48 AM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,182,471 times
Reputation: 8266
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeard View Post
short of poll taxes, I don't see what we can do about that.
Ultimately, they tend not to have a lot of political sway in most places anyway, so I don't really see it as a problem. Not to mention the income tax isn't the only federal, state, or local tax.

-----"they do not have a lot of political sway"--

Not true !

In 08, a city of 65,000 near me had a property tax referendum on the ballot that would increase property taxes.

The proponents campaigned heavily on the college campuses.
The referendum passed by a very narrow margin. It got defeated in all the other precints, but the college vote was so heavily in favor it made up for it.

AMAZING !-------college students living in state dorms that pay no property tax are able to vote and raise the taxes on the people who do pay them .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 05:51 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,631,619 times
Reputation: 3870
Quote:
college students living in state dorms that pay no property tax are able to vote and raise the taxes on the people who do pay them .
Well, that's democracy. You could probably lobby to get residency standards changed for voting in municipal elections in your state - though most of your fellow citizens probably won't get very excited about such an arcane topic.

But I think there is a wider issue. All voters have "skin in the game" simply by virtue of being a citizen of the US.

If fewer and fewer of them are taxpayers, then this reflects on society as a whole. Perhaps the upper classes would find it in their interest to find ways to create decent-paying jobs that enfranchise more people, and ease their populist anger.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 10:24 PM
 
Location: SouthCentral Texas
3,854 posts, read 4,833,949 times
Reputation: 960
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrummerBoy View Post
I see where you going with this idea, and yeah, I do agree that corporate-backed PAC's and lobbyists are far too prevalent on Capitol Hill, but as far as you thinking they don't deserve 1st Amendment free speech rights, you're forgetting something: corporations are comprised of people. Citizens! I realize it's sometimes convenient and helpful to think of a hugr corporations as a big, bad, monolithic sort of entity, but we must remember that they create jobs and contribute to society, as they are merely groups of people, with as many rights as you or I.
I dont disagree with the rulling, but to your point I will say this; Although corporations are comprised of citizens...those citizens dont get to vote on how their corporation backs an issue within the company. The board has the company's, hence the worker's, intrest in mind, but trumping everyone is the bottom line.

I guess the concern many folk have is that the corporation/ group can invest large amounts of money to back an issue, where the regular guy cant compete to get his message out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 10:38 PM
 
5,758 posts, read 11,631,619 times
Reputation: 3870
There's also the nationality issue. Many corporations - though incorporated in the US, or with substantial footprints in the US - are composed largely of foreign citizens.

What political interests does a Swiss or Chinese multinational conglomerate have?

I guess we'll find out...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top