U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 1.5 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 02-10-2010, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Maine
898 posts, read 992,379 times
Reputation: 542

Advertisements

It seems like an ok idea in theory. People who are down on their luck could live on a poor farm, having food and shelter provided for them. However they were all expected to work the farm insomuch as their bodies would allow them.

In practice, however, I don't know much about them, as they were well before my time. What do you all think?
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-10-2010, 12:11 PM
 
29,988 posts, read 27,772,017 times
Reputation: 12557
NO reason for this IMO. The requirement of the able-bodied receiving Medicaid to do some work, in some capacity, would accomplish the same goal. The problem is that those who are on Medicaid and able-bodied have no incentive to fend for themselves because they know the government will provide.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 12:23 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,293 posts, read 18,282,831 times
Reputation: 3750
They didn't work a century ago, and they sure as heck wouldn't work now. There are far too many lazy people who are financially rewarded for not working. There's no way they'll ever be willing to actually work again.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
4,794 posts, read 7,493,697 times
Reputation: 3805
I can think of some reasons to bring back poor farms.

They get the homeless off the streets. They are in one place and organized. Those who can work must do so. Not only could they raise their own food, but also produce some product to sell.

It is much cheaper for the state or city since one facility can take care of hundreds, instead of subsidizing individual houses or apts.

Crime would go down and education and health care better provided.

A modern, more compassionate, version of the old Victorian system could go a long way towards economically solving social problems.

Mainstreaming has not proven to work well and a lot of subsidized housing has turned into cess pools.

Not everyone can make it on their own- some people are better off with supervision.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:09 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
12,253 posts, read 14,070,512 times
Reputation: 12560
Give me 160 acres of decent land and I'll go do it in a second!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:10 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,293 posts, read 18,282,831 times
Reputation: 3750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollytree View Post
I can think of some reasons to bring back poor farms.

They get the homeless off the streets. They are in one place and organized. Those who can work must do so. Not only could they raise their own food, but also produce some product to sell.

It is much cheaper for the state or city since one facility can take care of hundreds, instead of subsidizing individual houses or apts.

Crime would go down and education and health care better provided.

A modern, more compassionate, version of the old Victorian system could go a long way towards economically solving social problems.

Mainstreaming has not proven to work well and a lot of subsidized housing has turned into cess pools.

Not everyone can make it on their own- some people are better off with supervision.
Part of the problem is that in order to do this, you would have to reverse the Deinstitutionalization that took place in the early 60s. It would require law enforcement officials to be able to move - and essentially lock up - the homeless and mentally ill, and to do it against their wills.

Right or wrong, I do not see that sort of thing ever happening.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:13 PM
 
Location: I think my user name clarifies that.
8,293 posts, read 18,282,831 times
Reputation: 3750
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chango View Post
Give me 160 acres of decent land and I'll go do it in a second!
I see you selectively used the word GIVE.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:21 PM
 
29,988 posts, read 27,772,017 times
Reputation: 12557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollytree View Post
I can think of some reasons to bring back poor farms.

They get the homeless off the streets. They are in one place and organized. Those who can work must do so. Not only could they raise their own food, but also produce some product to sell.

It is much cheaper for the state or city since one facility can take care of hundreds, instead of subsidizing individual houses or apts.

Crime would go down and education and health care better provided.

A modern, more compassionate, version of the old Victorian system could go a long way towards economically solving social problems.

Mainstreaming has not proven to work well and a lot of subsidized housing has turned into cess pools.

Not everyone can make it on their own- some people are better off with supervision.

Government internment camps (which is exactly what is being suggested by those in support) do not have a favorable history in the USA. They have been use extensivley in Russia, China, Nazi Germany, and other oppressive societies.

"Social problems" require the behavior be addressed and changed, not simply to have money thrown at them.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:23 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
3,089 posts, read 3,720,856 times
Reputation: 1573
probably off topic, but i think we should bring back "family farms"!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-10-2010, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
12,253 posts, read 14,070,512 times
Reputation: 12560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha Rocks View Post
I see you selectively used the word GIVE.

Well, yea. I'm entitled to it. It's not fair that people got to homestead 100 years ago but I don't.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $99,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2016, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 - Top