Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2007, 09:49 AM
 
Location: Oxygen Ln. AZ
9,319 posts, read 18,746,321 times
Reputation: 5764

Advertisements

That would also be too expensive for our final home. We are planning building a very small, solar home for our last box. I wish more communities would look at some alternative building products and hopefully in the near future the homes will cost less, not more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2007, 10:29 AM
 
Location: New Orleans, LA
1,846 posts, read 3,939,879 times
Reputation: 3376
I'm all for energy efficiency, but it has to save ME money, not cost extra!! I would very much prefer a house with energy efficient updates over one that would have higher energy bills, all else being equal.

I can afford a fairly large retirement home, but will probably get a smaller one in order to use (and pay for) less energy. Energy prices are likely to skyrocket in the coming years, in my opinion, so it makes sense to me to prepare for that.

I am not interested in any type of planned community, if it involves a lot of rules and monthly fees, and petty tyrants (oops, I mean Homeowners' Associations! ) intruding on my peaceful retirement life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2007, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
1,611 posts, read 4,853,404 times
Reputation: 1486
I agree about the housing cost being too high but the real issue for me is that it doesn't propose to be a mixed age community. Nothing against "seniors" (since I am about to turn 62 I can say this) but I frankly don't want to live in a neighborhood where everybody is the same age (relatively speaking). Why would this concept not be marketed to the full range of individuals who are interested in living green?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-30-2007, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,802 posts, read 41,008,695 times
Reputation: 62194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrover View Post
I agree about the housing cost being too high but the real issue for me is that it doesn't propose to be a mixed age community. Nothing against "seniors" (since I am about to turn 62 I can say this) but I frankly don't want to live in a neighborhood where everybody is the same age (relatively speaking). Why would this concept not be marketed to the full range of individuals who are interested in living green?
Because, it appears from the article that the developer's research showed a significant number of boomers who are green oriented would be willing to pay more to live in a green community. It only says they are going to concentrate their marketing on them not restrict the community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top