Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Thanks for adding to the conversation topaz. I can only assume you will soon explain how you feel the same way about pharmaceuticals, stem cell research, cloning, biomedical engineering,...
I assume also that not being a fan of main-stream science, that you understand completely when people quote scientists who have alternate views of global warming.
I hope everybody on this thread takes advantage of the opportunity to watch this. You won't get this much information anywhere.
<snip>YouTube video regarding UK GM wheat trials</snip>
Publicly-funded, wholly-contained research trials aren't the problem. The problem is that this level of research and testing ISN'T currently being conducted by non-partisan scientists who have no financial/business interest.
This particular GM wheat trial is being conducted by a group with a reasonably good track record of honestly divulging when their research works or doesn't, and for being conscientious about testing protocols and willing to allow 3rd-party retesting if concerns are raised or verification is needed. I think it would be wrong to ban controlled clinical trials and I would be very interested in seeing their research findings (assuming they don't get paid off or gagged like other similar non-partisan researchers).
Publicly-funded, wholly-contained research trials aren't the problem. The problem is that this level of research and testing ISN'T currently being conducted by non-partisan scientists who have no financial/business interest.
This particular GM wheat trial is being conducted by a group with a reasonably good track record of honestly divulging when their research works or doesn't, and for being conscientious about testing protocols and willing to allow 3rd-party retesting if concerns are raised or verification is needed. I think it would be wrong to ban controlled clinical trials and I would be very interested in seeing their research findings (assuming they don't get paid off or gagged like other similar non-partisan researchers).
So what you are saying is if this group determines it doesn't work they are honest but if it does work they are paid shills of the GM industry....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.