Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-11-2012, 09:45 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949

Advertisements

pspit, you are really getting a bit (quite a bit) retarded on this.

Consider for a moment Nukes cannot even get normal insurance. The insurance underwriters are not stupid.

Maybe background yourself a bit . . .

Expert: Nuclear Power Is On Its Deathbed - US News and World Report


Insurance cost vs. nuclear power risk | TribLIVE

Price
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2012, 09:51 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,396,384 times
Reputation: 30414
Which is why the USA continues to build so many of them every year
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-11-2012, 10:07 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949
You back on that gay We All Live on a Yellow Submarine stuff, Subby?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 06:32 AM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
pspit, you are really getting a bit (quite a bit) retarded on this.

Consider for a moment Nukes cannot even get normal insurance. The insurance underwriters are not stupid.

Maybe background yourself a bit . . .

Expert: Nuclear Power Is On Its Deathbed - US News and World Report


Insurance cost vs. nuclear power risk | TribLIVE

Price
There are many technologies that one can't get insurance on, what's your point....

Oh yeah, another report from a single progressive liberal professor proclaiming the death of XYZ technology.

The other article is well over a year old, since it was published new nuclear reactors have been approved..

Gotcha....

Still with the childish name calling huh? Grow up
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 06:36 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
It doesn't take a rocket nor nuclear scientist to see your phobia against nuclear reactors is totally groundless...

Nor could you confirm the OP's fears about nuclear energy with any accredited scientific data other than "I know about nuclear energy so ya'll are stupid to say anything to dispute me"

Have a nice day....
I have no phobia, I slept peacefully for several years within a few feet of a nuclear reactor. The difference between us if that you appear to see Popular Science as a textbook. As far as the OP's fears about radiation from an operating nuclear reactor, I think I've dismissed that as a no problem. What can't be dismissed is the vulnerability of many legacy reactors to Fukushima style accidents. I don't lose much sleep over that, but it's undeniably true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 06:39 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
Which is why the USA continues to build so many of them every year
There's a big difference between the Defense Department building a weapon system and a civilian decision based upon profit potential. Civilian nuclear is too expensive to survive outside a cocoon of massive government government subsidies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 06:40 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip T View Post
You back on that gay We All Live on a Yellow Submarine stuff, Subby?
Careful. I'm also a nuclear submariner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 06:44 AM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
I have no phobia, I slept peacefully for several years within a few feet of a nuclear reactor. The difference between us if that you appear to see Popular Science as a textbook. As far as the OP's fears about radiation from an operating nuclear reactor, I think I've dismissed that as a no problem. What can't be dismissed is the vulnerability of many legacy reactors to Fukushima style accidents. I don't lose much sleep over that, but it's undeniably true.
Free country you can believe what you want...

FACT: France has mostly Gen1 reactors that have been in constant operation for over 50 years supplying 78% of that countries power...

I am sure that the OP takes great comfort in your opinion knowing you are such an expert in land-based nuclear reactors...

Popular Science? what's that, a TV show?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 07:11 AM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,993,664 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by plwhit View Post
Free country you can believe what you want...

FACT: France has mostly Gen1 reactors that have been in constant operation for over 50 years supplying 78% of that countries power...

I am sure that the OP takes great comfort in your opinion knowing you are such an expert in land-based nuclear reactors...
Actually the bulk of France's reactors are clones of the Westinghouse 3 and 4 loop reactors installed in the US. Many are essentially identical to the South Texas Generating Station. These are are all late second and third generation plants. While much safer than 1st generation reactors, claiming that 35 years (let's a least come close to factual information) of operation demonstrates safety seems absolutely silly given our recent experience at Fukushima, which also had decades of uneventful operation prior to the revelation that their design was fundamentally unsafe. BTW there are about two dozen GE Mark-I reactors in the United States. These have the many of the same design flaws of Fukushima.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2012, 03:23 PM
 
15,912 posts, read 20,198,598 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by DCforever View Post
Actually the bulk of France's reactors are clones of the Westinghouse 3 and 4 loop reactors installed in the US. Many are essentially identical to the South Texas Generating Station. These are are all late second and third generation plants. While much safer than 1st generation reactors, claiming that 35 years (let's a least come close to factual information) of operation demonstrates safety seems absolutely silly given our recent experience at Fukushima, which also had decades of uneventful operation prior to the revelation that their design was fundamentally unsafe. BTW there are about two dozen GE Mark-I reactors in the United States. These have the many of the same design flaws of Fukushima.
~ Yawn ~
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Green Living
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top